首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Hydrofiber dressing with silver for the management of split-thickness donor sites: A randomized evaluation of two protocols of care
Authors:S. Blome-Eberwein  R.M. Johnson  S.F. Miller  D.M. Caruso  M.H. Jordan  S. Milner  E.E. Tredget  K.M. Sittig  L. Smith
Affiliation:1. Lehigh Valley Hospital, Regional Burn Center, 1210 South Cedar Crest Boulevard, Allentown, PA 18103-6218, United States;2. Miami Valley Hospital Burn Center, Dayton, OH, United States;3. Arizona Burn Center, Phoenix, AZ, United States;4. Burn Center at Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States;5. Johns Hopkins Burn Center, Baltimore, MD, United States;6. University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada;g LSUHSC Regional Burn Center, Shreveport, LA, United States;h Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Abstract:

Background

This randomized, open-label study evaluated Aquacel Ag® Hydrofiber® dressing with silver (HDS; ConvaTec, Skillman, NJ, USA) with an adherent or gelled protocol in the management of split-thickness donor sites.

Methods

HDS was the primary dressing in the adherent group (gauze as secondary covering) and gelled group (transparent film as secondary covering). Dressings were changed on study day 1 or 2 and study days 5 (optional), 10 (optional), and 14. The primary outcome was healing (≥90% re-epithelialization) at study day 14.

Results

Seventy subjects were treated (36 adherent, 34 gelled). By study day 14, 77% of donor sites had healed (67% adherent, 88% gelled). Pain scores decreased over time in both treatment groups. Investigators were “very satisfied” or “satisfied” with (adherent, gelled) time required to manage dressing change (89%, 79% of subjects), minimization of donor-site pain (64%, 82%), ease of application (97%, 94%), management of drainage (92%, 82%), ease of removal (77%, 85%), and ability of dressing to remain in place (69%, 76%). Thirty-nine (56%) subjects had adverse events, most commonly non-donor-site infection (11%) and gastrointestinal events (11%).

Conclusion

In this randomized, open-label study, HDS was well-tolerated, versatile, and effective in the management of split-thickness donor sites.
Keywords:Hydrofiber dressing with silver   Donor site   Healing   Pain
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号