Exploring the role of advanced clinical practitioners (ACPs) and their contribution to health services in England: A qualitative exploratory study |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Centre for Health Improvement, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Jubilee Campus, Nottingham, NG8 1BB , UK;2. Centre for Health Improvement, Leadership and Learning, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK;3. Health Sciences, QMC University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK;4. Allied Health Professions and Midwifery University Hospitals, Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, UK;5. Health Sciences University of Leicester, UK;6. Health and Life Sciences, School of Nursing and Midwifery De Montfort University, UK;7. Centre for Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Brunel University London, UK |
| |
| Abstract: | BackgroundAn extended role being explored globally is the advanced clinical practitioner (ACP). In England this is an extended role for allied health professions, nurses and midwives in a range of settings.ObjectivesThis paper focuses on three research questions: 1) What is the role of ACPs in England? 2) What are the barriers and facilitators to implementing the role? and 3) What is the contribution of ACPs to health services in England?Design/settingA qualitative, exploratory study to explore perspectives on the ACP role in a range of clinical settings.ParticipantsWe recruited 63 stakeholders, including 34 nurses, working in a ACP role or ACP education. A purposive snowball sampling technique identified participants meeting inclusion criteria.MethodsOne-to-one semi-structured interviews throughout 2020, recorded and transcribed verbatim, anonymised and thematically analysed.ResultsThe ACP role in England was undertaken in a broad range of clinical contexts. In England ‘advanced clinical practitioner’ was not a protected title. There were high levels of variability and ambiguity of understanding and deployment of the ACP role in England. Facilitators to the implementation process included training and education, clinical supervision and organisational support. Lack of protection for the role and variances in experience were barriers. Employer support facilitated development of the ACP role, however where support was limited, at either an individual or organisation level, this was a barrier. Our study highlighted the wide range of ways the ACP role benefitted patient outcomes and workforce development.ConclusionsThis study outlines the contribution that ACPs can make to health services, contributing factors and key barriers and facilitators to implementing this role. The work showed the positive contribution ACPs can make to service redesign, workforce development and patient outcomes, whilst accepting there is much work to do to ensure protected status and parity across all professions and clinical contexts |
| |
| Keywords: | Advanced clinical practice Advanced practitioner Interprofessional working Allied health professionals |
| 本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！ |
|
