Evolution of patient-reported outcome measures, 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery for subaxial cervical spine fractures,a nation-wide registry study |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Solnavägen 1, 113 65, Stockholm, Sweden;2. Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska sjukhuset ing 70, 1 tr, 751 85 Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden;3. Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, K54, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden;4. Department of Reconstructive Orthopedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Hälsovägen 13, 141 57, Stockhom, Sweden;5. Stockholm Spine Center, Löwenströmska Hospital, Karlavägen 108, 115 26, Upplands-Väsby, Sweden;6. Department of Orthopedics and Hand surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, von Kraemers allé 4, 752 37, Uppsala, Sweden |
| |
Abstract: | BACKGROUND CONTEXTA longer duration of patient follow up arguably provides more reliable data on the long-term effects of a treatment. However, the collection of long-term follow up data is resource demanding and often complicated by missing data and patients being lost to follow up. In surgical fixation for cervical spine fractures, data are lacking on the evolution of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) beyond 1-year of follow up. We hypothesized that the PROMs would remain stable beyond the 1-year postoperative follow up mark, regardless of the surgical approach.PURPOSETo assess the trends in the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at 1, 2-, and 5-years following surgery in patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries.STUDY DESIGNNation-wide observational study on prospectively collected data.PATIENT SAMPLEIndividuals treated for subaxial cervical spine fractures with anterior, posterior, or combined anteroposterior approaches, between 2006 and 2016 were identified in the Swedish Spine Registry (Swespine).OUTCOME MEASURESPROMs consisting of EQ-5D-3Lindex and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) were considered.METHODSPROMs data were available for 292 patients at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Five-years PROMs data were available for 142 of these patients. A simultaneous within-group (longitudinal) and between group (approach-dependent) analysis was performed using mixed ANOVA. The predictive ability of 1-year PROMs was subsequently assessed using linear regression.RESULTSMixed ANOVA revealed that PROMs remained stable from 1- to 2-years as well as from 2- to 5-years postoperatively and were not significantly affected by the surgical approach (p<0.05). A strong correlation was found between 1-year and both 2- and 5-years PROMs (R>0.7; p<0.001). Linear regression confirmed the accuracy of 1-year PROMs in predicting both 2- and 5-years PROMs (p<0.001).CONCLUSIONPROMs remained stable beyond 1-year of follow up in patients treated with anterior, posterior, or combined anteroposterior surgeries for subaxial cervical spine fractures. The 1-year PROMs were strong predictors of PROMs measured at 2, and 5 years. The 1-year PROMs were sufficient to assess the outcomes of subaxial cervical fixation irrespective of the surgical approach. |
| |
Keywords: | Cervical spine Fixation surgery |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|