首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Differential Relapse Patterns After Discontinuation of Entecavir vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B
Affiliation:1. Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. Toronto Viral Hepatitis Care Network, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan;5. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;6. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium;8. Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece;9. Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;10. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;11. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;12. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taiwan;13. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan;14. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;15. Centre for Individualized Infection Medicine, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Abstract:Background and AimsWhether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy.MethodsThis study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen–negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods.ResultsDuring a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups.ConclusionsTDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy.
Keywords:Tenofovir  Entecavir  Nucleos(T)Ide Analogue Withdrawal  Off-Therapy Outcomes  Chronic Hepatitis B  aHR"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0040"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  adjusted hazard ratio  ALT"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0050"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  alanine aminotransferase  CHB"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0060"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  chronic hepatitis B  CI"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0070"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  confidence interval  EOT"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0080"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  end of therapy  ETV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0090"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  entecavir  HBV"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0100"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hepatitis B virus  HBeAg"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0110"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hepatitis B e antigen  HBsAg"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0120"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hepatitis B surface antigen  HCC"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0130"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hepatocellular carcinoma  HR"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0140"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  hazard ratio  IFN"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0150"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  interferon  IPTW"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0160"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  inverse probability of treatment weighting  IQR"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0170"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  interquartile range  NA"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0180"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  nucleos(t)ide analogue  PEG"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0190"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  pegylated  SOT"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0200"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  start of therapy  TDF"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0210"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  tenofovir disoproxil fumarate  ULN"  },{"  #name"  :"  keyword"  ,"  $"  :{"  id"  :"  kwrd0220"  },"  $$"  :[{"  #name"  :"  text"  ,"  _"  :"  upper limit of normal
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号