Differential Relapse Patterns After Discontinuation of Entecavir vs Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic Hepatitis B |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Toronto Centre for Liver Disease, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;2. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;3. Toronto Viral Hepatitis Care Network, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;4. Division of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan;5. Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;6. Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;7. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium;8. Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laiko General Hospital, Athens, Greece;9. Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, IDIBAPS, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain;10. Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong;11. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands;12. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Linkou Medical Center, Chang Gung University, Linkou, Taiwan;13. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan;14. Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany;15. Centre for Individualized Infection Medicine, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research and Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Background and AimsWhether entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) differentially affect relapse and outcomes following treatment discontinuation across different patient subpopulations remains unclear. We aimed to compare rates of off-therapy hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss, virological and clinical relapse, and retreatment between chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who discontinued TDF or ETV therapy.MethodsThis study included 1402 virally suppressed CHB patients who stopped either ETV (n = 981) or TDF (n = 421) therapy between 2001 and 2020 from 13 participating centers across North America, Europe, and Asia. All patients were hepatitis B e antigen–negative at treatment discontinuation. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance the treatment groups. Outcomes were analyzed using survival methods.ResultsDuring a median off-treatment follow-up of 18 months, HBsAg loss occurred in 96 (6.8%) patients overall. Compared with ETV, TDF was associated with a higher rate of HBsAg loss (P = .03); however, the association was no longer significant after statistical adjustment (P = .61). Virological relapse occurred earlier among TDF-treated patients (P < .01); nonetheless, rates became comparable after the first year off therapy (P = .49). TDF was significantly associated with a higher clinical relapse rate than ETV throughout follow-up (P < .01). The development of a virological or clinical relapse did not affect the rate of HBsAg loss. Retreatment rates were not significantly different between the treatment groups.ConclusionsTDF and ETV have differential relapse patterns but are associated with similar rates of HBsAg loss and retreatment following discontinuation. Finite therapy can be considered for CHB patients on either TDF or ETV therapy. |
| |
Keywords: | Tenofovir Entecavir Nucleos(T)Ide Analogue Withdrawal Off-Therapy Outcomes Chronic Hepatitis B aHR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0040" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" adjusted hazard ratio ALT" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0050" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" alanine aminotransferase CHB" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0060" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" chronic hepatitis B CI" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0070" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" confidence interval EOT" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0080" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" end of therapy ETV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0090" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" entecavir HBV" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0100" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hepatitis B virus HBeAg" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0110" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hepatitis B e antigen HBsAg" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0120" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hepatitis B surface antigen HCC" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0130" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hepatocellular carcinoma HR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0140" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" hazard ratio IFN" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0150" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" interferon IPTW" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0160" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" inverse probability of treatment weighting IQR" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0170" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" interquartile range NA" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0180" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" nucleos(t)ide analogue PEG" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0190" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" pegylated SOT" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0200" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" start of therapy TDF" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0210" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" tenofovir disoproxil fumarate ULN" },{" #name" :" keyword" ," $" :{" id" :" kwrd0220" }," $$" :[{" #name" :" text" ," _" :" upper limit of normal |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|