首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

三种洗手用品洗手效果比较
引用本文:朱波,沈伟,黄家勤,彭宇生,王鹏,黄忠团,张淑萍.三种洗手用品洗手效果比较[J].中国科学美容,2014(5):139-141.
作者姓名:朱波  沈伟  黄家勤  彭宇生  王鹏  黄忠团  张淑萍
作者单位:[1]四川省宜宾市第—人民医院检验科,四川宜宾644000 [2]四川省宜宾市第-人民医院感染办公室,四川宜宾644000
摘    要:目的比较临床医护人员使用传统的肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液三种洗手用品洗手的效果。方法分别对三种洗手用品的效果进行细菌学监测并作统计学分析。结果肥皂、洗手液、无水洗手液洗手后平均菌数分别为10.1cfu/cm^2、8.3cfu/cm^2和3.6cfu/cm^2。结论无水洗手液洗手效果优于传统的肥皂和洗手液,且方便、快速、高效,值得临床广泛推广。

关 键 词:肥皂  洗手液  无水洗手液  洗手效果  细菌学监测

Comparison of hand-washing effects of three kinds of hand- washing products
ZHU Bo,SHEN Wei,HUANG Jiaqin,PENG Yusheng,WANG Pen,HUANG Zhongtuan,ZHANG Shuping.Comparison of hand-washing effects of three kinds of hand- washing products[J].China Scientific Cosmetology,2014(5):139-141.
Authors:ZHU Bo  SHEN Wei  HUANG Jiaqin  PENG Yusheng  WANG Pen  HUANG Zhongtuan  ZHANG Shuping
Institution:1.Department of Laboratory, Yibin First People's Hospital, Yibin 644000,China;2.Infection Office,Yibin First People's Hospital, Yibin 644000,China )
Abstract:Objective To compare the hand-washing effects of traditional soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer used by clinical medical workers. Methods The effects of three hand-washing products received bacteriological monitoring and statistical analysis. Results The average bacterial counts of soap, hand sanitizer, waterless hand sanitizer were 10.1cfu/cm^2, 8.3cfu/cm^2 and 3.6cfu/cm^2. Conclusion The hand-washing effect of waterless hand sanitizer is better than that of traditional soap and hand sanitizer, and it's convenient, fast and highly effective, thereby worthy of wide clinical promotion.
Keywords:Soap  Hand sanitizer  Waterless hand sanitizer  Hand-washing effect  Bacteriological monitoring
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号