Comparison of vessel diameters in electron beam tomography and quantitative coronary angiography

Electron beam tomography (EBT) has been shown to permit non-invasive imaging of the coronary arteries after intravenous injection of contrast agent and 3-dimensional reconstruction. We compared the vessel diameters in EBT reconstructions to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). 10 patients were investigated by EBT and QCA. 3-dimensional EBT reconstructions (shaded surface display) were performed after acquisition of 40 axial cross-sections of the heart with 3 mm slice thickness (1 mm overlap) which were obtained triggered to the ECG in breathhold following intravenous injection of 120–160 ml of contrast agent. A fixed lower reconstruction threshold of 80 HU was used to selectively visualize the contrast-enhanced coronary artery lumen. At 60 sites in the coronary artery system, the vessel diameters measured in the EBT reconstructions were compared to the diameters found in quantitative analysis of the patients' coronary angiograms. The correlation coefficient of the vessel diameters in EBT and QCA was 0.83. Mean vessel diameters were not significantly different in EBT and QCA (3.06±0.93 vs. 2.97±0.94 mm). However, very small vessel diameters tended to be underestimated in the EBT reconstructions, which was due to the partial volume effect. If only vessel diameters measured in the left main or left anterior descending coronary artery were compared to QCA, the correlation increased to 0.87, since these vessel segments are less prone to artifacts in the EBT investigation. Vessel diameters in EBT and QCA correlate reasonably well. Due to partial volume effects, the diameter of very small vessels and stenotic segments tends to be underestimated by EBT.