Comparative growth of human tumors in pharmacologically immunosuppressed,immune-deprived,cyclosporin a-treated and nude mice |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. College of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA;2. Institutes of Biosciences and Technology, Houston, TX 77843, USA;3. Texas A & M Health Sciences Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;1. Departamento de Química Inorgánica y Nuclear, Facultad de Química, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, DF CP 04510, Mexico;2. Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, DF CP 04510, Mexico;3. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Avenida Universidad 3000, DF CP04510, Mexico |
| |
Abstract: | The growth of three human tumor xenografts, namely an Ewing sarcoma, a colon carcinoma and an osteosarcoma, was compared in nude and conditioned mice. Conditioning protocols included (1) immune deprivation (thymectomy, lethal irradiation and cytosine arabinoside pretreatment); (2) immunosuppression with procarbazine, cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte serum; and (3) continuous administration of cyclosporin A. Similar tumor growth was seen in nude mice, immune-deprived mice and mice treated with the medium and high-dose immunosuppressive protocol. Cyclosporin A allowed only very modest tumor growth. In the main comparative experiment with the Ewing sarcoma and the colon carcinoma, overall survival was lowest with nude mice (17%), higher with immune-deprived mice (61%) and best with immunosuppressed mice (81 and 87%). For the screening of anticancer agents the immunosuppressive protocol consisting of synergistic procarbazine, cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte serum may be added to the already available models. It allows adequate tumor growth with good animal survival and does not require operative procedures and irradiation. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|