神经外科气管切开病人两种气道内湿化方法效果分析

[目的]观察气管切开病人使用两种气道内湿化方法的效果.[方法]将80例气管切开病人随机分为观察组和对照组各40例,对照组采用间断注射器滴入湿化法,观察组采用推注泵持续推注法,对两组病人的肺部感染发生率、置管时间进行比较.[结果]观察组病人肺部感染率低于对照组、置管时间短于对照组,经比较差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）.[结论]推注泵持续推注法较间断注射器滴入湿化法效果好,能更有效地预防肺部感染的发生及缩短置管时间.

Analysis on effect of two kinds of airway humidification methods for neurosurgical patients with tracheotomy

Objective：To observe the effect of two kinds of airway humidifi- cation methods for neurosurgical patients with traeheotomy. Methods： A total of 80 cases of patients with tracheotomy were randomly divided into observation group and control group,40 cases in each,intermittent syringe trickle humidification was used for patients of control group, continued bo- lus injection pump method was used for patients of observation group ,then to compare the incidence of lung infection and catheter time of two groups of patients. Results：Compared with control group,the incidence of lung in- fection was lower, the catheter time was shorter, and the differences were statistically significant （P ~ 0. 05）. Conclusion： The effect of continuous bolus injection method with bolus injection pump is better than that of in- termittent syringe trickle humidification method,can more effectively pre- vent the occurrence of pulmonary infection and shorten catheter time.