Effect of Intravascular Iodinated Contrast Media on Natural Course of End-Stage Renal Disease Progression in Hemodialysis Patients: A Prospective Study |
| |
Authors: | Radim Janousek Antonin Krajina Jan H. Peregrin Sylvie Dusilova-Sulkova Ondrej Renc Jan Hajek Kamil Dvorak Petr Fixa Eva Cermakova |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, 14021 Prague 4, Czech Republic;(2) Department of Radiology, Charles University Hospital, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;(3) Division of Nephrology, Department of Gerontology and Metabolism, Charles University Hospital, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;(4) Department of Radiology, Central Hospital, Kyjevska 44, 53203 Pardubice, Czech Republic;(5) Fresenius Medical Care, D.C, Kyjevska 44, 53203 Pardubice, Czech Republic;(6) Department of Gerontometabolic Medicine, Charles University Hospital, Sokolska 581, 50005 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic;(7) Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Simkova 870, 50038 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic |
| |
Abstract: | We evaluated the impact of intravascular iodinated contrast medium on residual diuresis in hemodialyzed patients. Two groups of clinically stable hemodialyzed patients with residual diuresis minimally 500 ml of urine per day were studied. The patients from the first group were given iso-osmolal contrast agent iodixanol (Visipaque, GE Healthcare, United Kingdom) in concentration of iodine 320 mg/ml with osmolality 290 mOsm/kg of water during the endovascular procedure. The second control group was followed without contrast medium administered. Residual diuresis and residual renal excretory capacity expressed as 24-h calculated creatinine clearance were evaluated in the both groups after 6 months. The evaluated group included 42 patients who were given 99.3 ml of iodixanol in average (range, 60–180 ml). The control group included 45 patients. There was no statistically significant difference found between both groups in daily volume of urine (P = 0.855) and calculated clearance of creatinine (P = 0.573). We can conclude that residual diuresis is not significantly influenced by intravascular administration of iso-osmolal iodinated contrast agent (iodixanol) in range of volume from 60 to 180 ml in comparison to natural course of urinary output and residual renal function during end-stage renal disease. This result can help the nephrologist to decide which imaging method/contrast medium to use in dialyzed patients in current practice. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|