首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

房室结慢径消融对心房电生理性质的影响
引用本文:尹晓盟,张树龙,高连君,杨东辉,夏云龙,常栋,丛培鑫,王尹曼,魏显敬,林治湖,杨延宗. 房室结慢径消融对心房电生理性质的影响[J]. 中华心律失常学杂志, 2010, 14(3). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2010.03.016
作者姓名:尹晓盟  张树龙  高连君  杨东辉  夏云龙  常栋  丛培鑫  王尹曼  魏显敬  林治湖  杨延宗
作者单位:大连医科大学附属第一医院心内科,116011
摘    要:目的 慢径消融降低了心房颤动(房颤)的易感性,但具体机制不明.本文旨在探讨消融后心房电生理性质的改变及其具体机制.方法 32例房室结折返性心动过速患者,测量射频消融前后窦性心率及高位右心房、低位右心房、冠状静脉窦近端和远端各部位的有效不应期和易感窗口,以及房室结快径前传不应期的变化.结果 (1)慢径消融前后下列部位的有效不应期的变化分别为:冠状静脉窦近端(21 8.1±21.8)ms,(235.3±23.6)ms,P<0.0001;冠状静脉窦远端(230.9±21.0)ms,(244.7±25.1)ms,P<0.01;低位右心房(198.8±26.7)ms,(219.7±28.7)ms,P<0.005;高位右心房(214.4±35.1)ms,(213.4±37.3)ms,P=0.6.(2)在消融术后,房颤的诱发比例下降,冠状静脉窦近端的易感窗口显著降低(P=0.03),冠状静脉窦远端和低位右心房的易感窗口有所降低,高位右心房的易感窗口不变,但差异无统计学意义.(3)消融后窦性心率有一定程度的上升(72.1±5.6)次/min对(74±6.8)次/min,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.17).(4)慢径消融使快径前传不应期缩短,消融前后分别为(391±55)ms,(369±78)ms,P<0.01.结论 慢径消融使心房多部位的电生理性质发生了改变,导致冠状静脉窦近端和远端,以及低位右心房的有效不应期延长,房颤诱发几率降低.该现象的原因可能与消融造成的迷走神经功能改变有关.

关 键 词:心房  房室结慢径区  消融

Impact of slow pathway ablation on atrial electrophysiology
YIN Xiao-meng,ZHANG Shu-long,GAO Lian-jun,YANG Dong-hui,XIA Yun-long,CHANG Dong,CONG Pei-xin,WANG Yin-man,WEI Xian-jing,LIN Zhi-hu,YANG Yan-zong. Impact of slow pathway ablation on atrial electrophysiology[J]. Chinese Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias, 2010, 14(3). DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-6638.2010.03.016
Authors:YIN Xiao-meng  ZHANG Shu-long  GAO Lian-jun  YANG Dong-hui  XIA Yun-long  CHANG Dong  CONG Pei-xin  WANG Yin-man  WEI Xian-jing  LIN Zhi-hu  YANG Yan-zong
Abstract:Objective The ablation of the atrioventricular node slow pathway may reduce the inducibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) ,but the mechanisms remain unknown. We tried to investigate the impact of ablation on atria refractory period, and to elucidate the underlying mechanism. Methods Thirty-two patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) were enrolled in the study. Atria effective refractory period (ERP) and vulnerable window (VW) at high right atrium (HRA),inferior right atrium (IRA),distal (CSd) and proximal CS (CSp) ,as well as sinus rate (SR) and effective refractory period of fast pathway (FERP) were measured before and after ablation. Results ( 1 ) After ablation, the ERP at HRA did not change:(214. 4 ± 35. 1 ) ms, (213.4 ± 37. 3) ms, P = 0. 6, on the other hand, the ERPs at following sites were significantly prolonged:CSp(218. 1 ±21.8)ms, (235.3 ± 23.6) ms,P <0. 0001 ;CSd(230. 9 ±21.0) ms, (244. 7 ±25. 1)ms,P<0. 01;IRA(198.8 ±26.7)ms,(219.7 ±28. 7) ms,P < 0.005,respectively. (2) The VW of HRA remained unchanged after ablation, while the VWs of CSp, CSd and IRA trended to decline despite no statistic significant. (3)SR showed a little increasing but without statistic significant after ablation (P = 0. 17 ).(4) ERP of fast pathway was significantly decreased after ablation: ( 391 ± 55 ) ms, ( 369 ± 78 ) ms, P < 0. 01.Conclusions The decrease of ERPs at CS and IRA, as well as F-ERP after ablation may decline the inducibility of atrial fibrillation and indicates regional vagal denervation to the atrium.
Keywords:Atria  Atrioventricular node slow pathway  Ablation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号