首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

乳腺癌患者生存质量影响因素分析
引用本文:郭雪蓉,王国平,张永贞,白旭斌,杨国庆,张晶晶. 乳腺癌患者生存质量影响因素分析[J]. 肿瘤研究与临床, 2011, 23(7): 456-459. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2011.07.007
作者姓名:郭雪蓉  王国平  张永贞  白旭斌  杨国庆  张晶晶
作者单位:1. 山西医科大学公共卫生学院,太原,030001
2. 山西省肿瘤医院
3. 山西省肿瘤研究所流行病室
摘    要:目的对乳腺癌患者生存质量进行测量和综合评价,筛选出影响乳腺癌患者生存质量的因素,为提高患者生存质量提供建议。方法利用癌症治疗方法评估表-乳腺癌分量表(FACT—B)、症状自评量表SCL-90和社会支持量表,采用调查病例、面访与问卷相结合的方法对260例乳腺癌住院患者的生存质量进行测量和评价。采用SPSS13.0软件对数据进行统计学分析,筛选出影响乳腺癌患者生存质量的主要因素。结果影响生存质量总分因素为经济状况(偏回归系数β=2.024,P=0.003)、情绪调节能力(β=4.993,P=0.000)以及婚姻质量自我评价(β=-3.954,P=0.001);影响生理领域得分的因素为情绪调节能力(β=0.987,P:0.008)以及应激事件次数(β=-0.866,P=0.011);影响社会家庭领域得分的因素为经济状况(β=1.016,P=0.000)、婚姻状况(β=-1.018,P=0.041)、情绪调节能力(β=0.971,P=0.008)以及婚姻质量自我评价(β=-1.382,P=0.001);影响情感领域得分的因素为情绪调节能力(β=1.094,P=0.000)和婚姻质量自我评价(β=-0.892,P=0.006);影响功能领域得分的影响因素为地区因素(β=1.653,P=0.008)、情绪调控能力(β=0.962,P=0.01)以及生活质量自我评价(β=-1.705,P=0.000)。结论指导患者正确认识乳腺癌,坚定生活信心,加强康复锻炼,并使患者拥有良好的家庭环境和必要的社会福利保证等可促进其功能恢复,进而提高生存质量。

关 键 词:乳腺肿瘤  生活质量  影响因素  回归分析

Study on the factors influencing the quality of life among patients with breast cancer
GUO Xue-rong,WANG Guo-ping,ZHANG Yong-zhen,BAI Xu-bin,YANG Guo-qing,Zhang Jing-jing. Study on the factors influencing the quality of life among patients with breast cancer[J]. Cancer Research and Clinic, 2011, 23(7): 456-459. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1006-9801.2011.07.007
Authors:GUO Xue-rong  WANG Guo-ping  ZHANG Yong-zhen  BAI Xu-bin  YANG Guo-qing  Zhang Jing-jing
Affiliation:. (Department of Social Medicine and Health Management, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China)
Abstract:Objective To describe the quality of life of breast cancer patients and explore the risk factors for their quality of life (QOL). Methods QOL of 260 patients with breast cancer were studied using FACT-B, SCL-90, Social Support Rating Scale and multiple linear regression models to study the main factors influencing the QOL of patients with breast cancer on functional scales (physical, social, emotional, role). Results Economic conditions (β =2.024, P =0.003), emotion regulation ability (β =4.993, P =0.000) and self-evaluation of marital quality (β =-3.954, P =0.001) were associated with total QOL scores, emotion regulation ability (β =0.987, P =0.008), the number of emergency incidents (β=-0.866, P =0.011) were associated with physical domain scores, economic conditions (β =1.016, P =0.000), marital status (β =-1.018, P =0.041), emotion regulation ability (β =0.971, P =0.008), self-evaluation of marital quality (β =-1.382, P =0.001) were associated with social and family domain scores, emotion regulation ability (β =1.094, P =0.000), self-evaluation of marital quality (β =-0.892, P =0.006) were associated with emotional domain scores, regional factors(β =1.653, P =0.008), emotion regulation ability (β =0.962, P=0.01), self-evaluation of the QOL (β =-1.705, P =0.000) were associated with function domain scores. Conclusion Guiding the patients to have a correct understanding of the breast cancer, strengthening their confidence of life, increasing physical activity, having a good family environment and necessary social welfare so that improving the QOL of the patients.
Keywords:Breast neoplasms  Quality of life  Factors  Regression analysis
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号