| 关于《素问·阴阳离合论》中“开/关”的思考 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 况彦德,黄河. 关于《素问·阴阳离合论》中“开/关”的思考[J]. 河南中医, 2009, 29(5): 437-438 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 况彦德 黄河 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广西中医学院,广西,南宁,530001 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 无论从开/关之相互演变推论,还是从其经文之互参印证判断,或是从其确切涵义分析,结论都同时指向一处：即＂开＂字多为误传,正解乃＂关＂。＂太阳为关,阳明为阖,少阳为枢＂应为《内经》之原文。
|
| 关 键 词： | “开/关阖枢”理论 《素问·阴阳离合论》 太阳 阳明 少阳 气机 |
Pondering Door-pass and door-close in Essential Questions-Discussion on Dissociation and Equilibrium of Yin-yang |
| |
| Kuang Yande,Huang He. Pondering Door-pass and door-close in Essential Questions-Discussion on Dissociation and Equilibrium of Yin-yang[J]. Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2009, 29(5): 437-438 |
| |
| Authors: | Kuang Yande Huang He |
| |
| Affiliation: | Postgraduate in Grade 2006;Guangxi College of TCM;Guangxi;Nanning;530001 |
| |
| Abstract: | Inferring from the evolvement of door-pass and door-close,judging from the mutual testifying and referring of the original text,or analyzing from the precise meaning,the conclusion demonstrates that the character "door-pass" is misrepresent,and the correct explanation should be "door-close".And the original text in Huangdi's Internal Classic should be that"taiyang is the door-close,yangming is the gate,and shaoyang is the pivot". |
| |
| Keywords: | theory of door-close door-pass and pivot Essential Questions-Discussion on Dissociation and Equilibrium of Yin-yang taiyang yangming shaoyang qi movement |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
