高中生时间管理倾向对睡眠质量的影响

目的 了解高中生时间管理倾向与睡眠质量之间的关系。方法 采用《个人基本情况调查表》、《匹兹堡睡眠质量指数量表(PSQI)》和《青少年时间管理倾向量表(ATMDI) 》对597名高中生进行测查。结果 高中生时间管理倾向均值3.06处于中上水平(134.93±17.92),三个因子中时间价值感均值3.32最高(33.26±5.44),时间监控观均值2.91最低(69.94±11.42)。方差分析表明时间管理倾向和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数的年级差异有显著性(F=6.68,P=0.001;F=19.02,P<0.001),进一步的两两比较发现高三与高一、高二年级之间时间管理倾向和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数差异有显著性(P=0.001;P=0.007;P<0.001;P<0.001);时间管理倾向与匹兹堡睡眠质量指数呈显著负相关(r=-0.24,P=0.000);多元线性回归分析显示年级和时间效能感对匹兹堡睡眠质量指数有负向作用(P<0.001,95%CI:0.261～0.719; -0.169～-0.057)。结论 年级和时间效能感可以负向预测睡眠质量。

Effect of time management disposition on sleep quality of senior high school students

Objective To understand the relationship between time management disposition and sleep quality of senior high school students. Methods A total of 597 senior high school students were surveyed by using the Personal Basic Situation Questionnaire, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the Adolescence Time Management Disposition Inventory (ATMDI). Results The average of ATMDI of the senior high school students was 3.06, which was in the middle and upper level (134.93±17.92). Among the three factors, the average of time value was 3.32, which was the highest (33.26±5.44), and the average of time monitoring was 2.91, which was the lowest (69.94±11.42). The analysis of variance showed that there were significant grade differences in ATMDI and PSQI (F=6.68, P=0.001; F=19.02, P<0.001) between grade three, grade one and grade two (P=0.001; P=0.007; P<0.001; P<0.001); ATMDI was significantly negatively related to PSQI (r=-0.24, P<0.001). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that grade and time efficacy had a negative effect on PSQI (P<0.001, 95%CI: 0.261-0.719; from -0.169 to -0.057). Conclusion Grade and time efficacy can negatively predict sleep quality.