首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

常规法与细菌集菌法复试无菌检测中可疑阳性样品的结果比较
引用本文:李家琪,洪学军,章激,曹军华,何标,韩韬. 常规法与细菌集菌法复试无菌检测中可疑阳性样品的结果比较[J]. 中国药业, 2005, 14(9): 42-43
作者姓名:李家琪  洪学军  章激  曹军华  何标  韩韬
作者单位:华中科技大学同济医学院附属襄樊医院,湖北,襄樊,441021
摘    要:目的:建立鉴定样品灭菌彻底与否的方法,以杜绝药物医疗事故的发生.方法:将常规法检测中的可疑阳性样品(5个品种、20批次),用常规法和细菌集菌法进行复试.结果:常规法复试的阳性率为0;细菌集菌法复试的阳性率为65.0%,其中20%甘露醇注射液为87.5%,5%葡萄糖注射液为66.6%,10%葡萄糖注射液为50.0%.结论:细菌集菌法不受外环境污染,能高效、快速、准确地检验样品的灭菌情况,是药物制剂质量控制的好方法.

关 键 词:常规法  细菌集菌法  可疑阳性样品  复试
文章编号:1006-4931(2005)09-0042-01
收稿时间:2004-11-01
修稿时间:2005-02-16

Results Comparison of Retesting the Doubtful Positive Samples with Conventional Test and Bacteria- collecting Test
Li Jiaqi,Hong Xuejun,Zhang Ji,Cao Junhua,He Biao,Han Tao. Results Comparison of Retesting the Doubtful Positive Samples with Conventional Test and Bacteria- collecting Test[J]. China Pharmaceuticals, 2005, 14(9): 42-43
Authors:Li Jiaqi  Hong Xuejun  Zhang Ji  Cao Junhua  He Biao  Han Tao
Abstract:Objective:To develop a method for truly identifying whether the sample sterilization is absolute to avoid the medical accidents. Methods:The doubtful positive samples with conventional sterility test were retested with conventional sterility test and bacteria- collecting sterility test, including five breeds and twenty batches.Results:The positive rates were 0 for conventional retesting,65.0% for bacteria- collecting retesting,87.5% for 20% mannitol injection,66.6% for 5% glucose injection,50.0% for 10% glucose,respectively.Conclusion:The closed bacteria- collecting sterility testing isn't polluted by environment and it can identify sterilization of the sample high efficiently,rapidly and accurately.The test is a good way to control the quality of drug preparation.
Keywords:conventional sterility test  bacteria- collecting sterility test  doubtful positive sample  retest
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号