首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

门冬胰岛素联合中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素在控制餐后血糖中的作用
引用本文:高妍,潘长玉,邹大进,许樟荣,刘晓民,郭晓蕙. 门冬胰岛素联合中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素在控制餐后血糖中的作用[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2009, 89(28): 1960-1963. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2009.28.008
作者姓名:高妍  潘长玉  邹大进  许樟荣  刘晓民  郭晓蕙
作者单位:1. 北京大学第一医院内分泌科,100034
2. 解放军总医院内分泌科
3. 第二军医大学附属长海医院内分泌科
4. 解放军三.六医院内分泌科
5. 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院内分泌科
6. 北京大学第一医院内分泌科
摘    要:目的 比较门冬胰岛素(IAsp)和可溶性人胰岛素(HI)分别联合中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素(NPH)在糖尿病治疗中的有效性和安全性.方法 220例来自全国5家医院的1型(T1DM)或2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者按1:1的比例随机分为两组,分别接受IAsp或HI联合NPH治疗.以空腹血糖(FPG)、餐后2 h血糖(2h PPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)及低血糖事件作为评价指标.结果 IAsp/NPH组[(14.6±5.3)mmol/L比(8.4±4.1)nunol/L]较HI/NPH组治疗后2 h PPG改善更为显著[(14.9±3.9)mmol/L比(10.6±3.5)mmoL/L,P<0.05],且达标率分别为50.0%、25.5%(P<0.01).治疗后IAsp/NPH组[(9.3±1.4)%比(7.7±1.3)%]和HI/NPH组[(9.2±1.2)%比(7.7±1.2)%]HbA1c明显下降,但两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.437).达标率分别为24.5%和14.5%(P<0.05).在Imp/NPH组未见严重低血糖事件和其他不良事件,且夜间低血糖发生率更低(IAsp/NPH:3%,HI/NPH:4%).IAap/NPH组与HI/NPH组患者胰岛素日均剂量分别是0.60/0.23 IU/kg和0.65/0.24 IU/kg.结论 IAsp联合NPH能更好地控制餐后血糖,提高患者血糖达标率且不增加夜间低血糖和不良事件的风险.

关 键 词:糖尿病,2型  低血糖症  胰岛素  强化治疗

Postprandial glycemic control using insulin aspart with NPH in inadequately controlled diabetics
GAO Yan,PAN Chang-yu,ZOU Da-jin,XU Zhang-rong,LIU Xiao-min,GUO Xiao-hui. Postprandial glycemic control using insulin aspart with NPH in inadequately controlled diabetics[J]. Zhonghua yi xue za zhi, 2009, 89(28): 1960-1963. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2009.28.008
Authors:GAO Yan  PAN Chang-yu  ZOU Da-jin  XU Zhang-rong  LIU Xiao-min  GUO Xiao-hui
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin aspart (IAsp) and human insulin (HI) when applied as meal-time insulin with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) at bedtime in diabetics. Methods A total of 220 Chinese subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes from 5 dfferent hospitals were randomized by a ratio of 1:1 into two groups accepting IAsp or HI combined with NPH respectively. The main cndpoints were assessed by fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2 hour postprandial plasma glucose (2 h PPG), HbA1c and hypoglycemia. Results A greater reduction in mean 2 h PPG was achieved in the IAsp group[(14.6±5.3)mmol/L] as compared with the HI group [(8.4±4.1)mmol/L| (P< 0.01, adjusted for baseline value, center effect and diabetes type). Significantly mare IAsp-treated subjects reached the 2 h PPG target (50.0% vs 25.5%, P <0.01). HbAlc was reduced mare in IAsp/NPH group [(9.3±1.4)% vs (7.7±1.3)%] than in HI/NPH group [(9.2±1.2)% va (7.7±1.2)%] . HbAIc target was reached by 24.5% (IAap) vs 14.5% (HI) of subjects (P<0.05). No major hypoglycemia or serious adverse events were observed for the IAsp group, Lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia (IAsp/ NPH: 3% vs HI/NPH: 4%) was reported in the IAsp group. Average daily insulin doses were 0.60/0.23 (IAsp/NPH) and 0.65/0.24 (HI/NPH) IU/kg respectively. Conclusion Treatment of IAsp in basal-bolus therapy in combination with NPH provides a superior postprandial glucose control and allows mare subjects to reach the glycemic target without elevating the nocturnal hypoglycemic risk or adverse events.
Keywords:Diabetes mellitas,type 2  Hypoglycemia  Insulin  Intensive therapy
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号