Meropenem and Vaborbactam: Stepping up the Battle against Carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae |
| |
Authors: | Sarah Christina Jane Jorgensen Michael Joseph Rybak |
| |
Institution: | 1. Anti‐infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan;2. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan;3. Department of Pharmacy Services, Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan |
| |
Abstract: | Vaborbactam (VAB; formerly RPX7009) is a novel beta‐lactamase inhibitor based on a cyclic boronic acid pharmacophore with potent inhibitory activity against Ambler class A and C beta‐lactamases. It has been co‐formulated with meropenem to restore its activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC). VAB does not inhibit class B or D carbapenemases, nor does it improve the activity of meropenem against multidrug‐resistant nonfermenting gram‐negative bacilli, notably Acinetobacter spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The purpose of this article is to review existing data pertaining to the biochemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, in vitro activity, and current progress in clinical trials of meropenem and VAB (MV). Phase 1 studies have demonstrated single and multiple doses of VAB up to 2000 mg, alone or in combination with meropenem 2000 mg administered as a prolonged infusion over 3 hours, are well tolerated with an adverse effect profile similar to that of meropenem monotherapy. The available data suggest preexisting resistance among KPC‐producing isolates is rare. Strains with elevated MICs have been characterized by multiple resistance determinants including porin defects, increased drug efflux, and increased blaKPC expression. It remains uncertain whether multifactorial resistance will emerge during MV treatment and with more widespread use. Early data are positive for complicated urinary tract infections and MV compared with best available therapy in patients with serious carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacteriaciae (CRE) infections. As clinicians contemplate how to incorporate MV into CRE treatment strategies, it will be important to track and understand resistance, discern the role, if any, of combination therapy in enhancing efficacy and/or preserving activity, and define the specific therapeutic niche of MV among the expanding anti‐CRE armamentarium. |
| |
Keywords: | meropenem and vaborbactam carbapenem‐resistant Enterobacteriaceae Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase multidrug resistant |
|
|