首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

4种血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗药治疗轻中度高血压的成本-效果分析
引用本文:吴瀛达,鲍仕慧. 4种血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗药治疗轻中度高血压的成本-效果分析[J]. 中国药房, 2006, 17(17): 1311-1312
作者姓名:吴瀛达  鲍仕慧
作者单位:温州医学院附属第二医院药剂科,温州市,325027
摘    要:目的:评价4种血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗药治疗轻中度高血压的成本-效果。方法:104例轻、中度高血压患者分为4组,分别应用替米沙坦、氯沙坦钾、厄贝沙坦、缬沙坦治疗,8wk后比较临床效果并进行成本-效果分析。结果:4种用药方案在疗效比较上差异无统计学意义(P>0·05),成本分别为684·00、760·80、659·20、720·80元,成本-效果比分别为7·74、9·51、7·91、8·07。结论:替米沙坦从药物经济学的角度分析为治疗轻中度高血压的较优药物。

关 键 词:成本-效果分析  替米沙坦  氯沙坦钾  厄贝沙坦  缬沙坦  高血压
文章编号:1001-0408(2006)17-1311-02
收稿时间:2006-03-14
修稿时间:2006-05-12

Four Kinds of Angiotensin Ⅱ Receptor Blockers for Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension: Cost-effectiveness Analysis
WU Yingda,BAO Shihui. Four Kinds of Angiotensin Ⅱ Receptor Blockers for Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension: Cost-effectiveness Analysis[J]. China Pharmacy, 2006, 17(17): 1311-1312
Authors:WU Yingda  BAO Shihui
Affiliation:Dept. of Pharmacy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou 325027, China
Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To conduct cost-effectiveness analysis on four kinds of angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blockers (ARBs)in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.METHODS:A total of 104 cases with mild to moderate essential hypertension were assigned to receive telmisartan, losartan potassium, irbesartan or valsartan, respectively. 8 weeks later, the clinical effects were compared and the cost-effectiveness analyses of the four schemes were performed.RESULTS:The curative effects of the 4 schemes were of no significant difference (P>0.05),the costs of the 4 groups were 684.00 yuan,760.80 yuan,659.20 yuan and 720.80yuan,respectively,the cost-effectiveness ratios were 7.74,9.51,7.91 and 8.07,respectively.CONCLUSION:Pharmacoeconomically, telmisartan is the optimal one in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
Keywords:Cost - effectiveness analysis   Telmisartan    Losartan potassium   Irbesartan    Valsartan    Hypertension
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号