| 遮盖法与增视仪治疗黄斑注视性弱视的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 柯敏,范寒桂,管志华,罗红,程实. 遮盖法与增视仪治疗黄斑注视性弱视的比较[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 1998, 0(2) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 柯敏 范寒桂 管志华 罗红 程实 |
| |
| 作者单位： | Department of Ophthalmos，Second Affiliated Hospital，Hubei Medical University，Wuhan 430071，China |
| |
| 摘 要： | 利用华亚增视仪对２５例黄斑注视性弱视进行治疗，同时用常规遮盖法治疗黄斑注视性弱视２１例作为对照组。结果表明：增视仪治疗组有效率为８４．０％，而常规遮盖法治疗组有效率为５７．１％，两者比较差异有显者性，Ｐ＜０．０１。观察结果提示增视仪在治疗非中心注视性弱视中有较好的疗效。
|
| 关 键 词： | 弱视／治疗；方法；对比研究 |
Comparison of Effects of Colors flickering Instrument with the Routine eye covering Method in False Foved Fixation of Amblyopia |
| |
| Ke Min,Fan Hangui,Guan Zhihua,et al. Comparison of Effects of Colors flickering Instrument with the Routine eye covering Method in False Foved Fixation of Amblyopia[J]. Medical Journal of Wuhan University, 1998, 0(2) |
| |
| Authors: | Ke Min Fan Hangui Guan Zhihua et al |
| |
| Abstract: | Objactive:To study the effects of Huaya colors flickering instrument made in Huaya Corporation, in treating FFFA. Method: Twenty five cases of FFFA were treated with Huaya colors flickering instrument and 21 cases of FFFA were treated with the routine eye covering method. Result:The effective rate was 84.0% in Huaya colors flickering instrument group and 57.1% in the routine eye covering treatment group. A statistics analysis shows that the difference was significant between the two groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that Huaya colors flickering instrument is more effective in treating FFFA than the routine eye covering method. |
| |
| Keywords: | amblyopia/TH method comparative study |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
