首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


A Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Increase Resident Choice in Long Term Care
Authors:John F Schnelle  Annie Rahman  Daniel W Durkin  Linda Beuscher  Leena Choi  Sandra F Simmons
Institution:1. Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Center for Quality Aging, Nashville, TN;2. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, VA Medical Center, Nashville, TN;3. University of Southern California, Andrus Gerontology Center, Los Angeles, CA;4. Vanderbilt University, School of Nursing, Nashville, TN;5. Vanderbilt University, School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics, Nashville, TN
Abstract:ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to evaluate an intervention to improve staff offers of choice to nursing home residents during morning care.DesignA controlled trial with a delayed intervention design.SettingFour community, for-profit nursing homes.ParticipantsA total of 169 long-stay nursing home residents who required staff assistance with morning care and were able to express their care preferences.InterventionResearch staff held weekly training sessions with nurse aides (NAs) for 12 consecutive weeks focused on how to offer choice during four targeted morning care areas: when to get out of bed, when to get dressed/what to wear, incontinence care (changing and/or toileting), and where to dine. Training sessions consisted of brief video vignettes illustrating staff-resident interactions followed by weekly feedback about how often choice was being provided based on standardized observations of care conducted weekly by research staff.MeasurementsResearch staff conducted standardized observations during a minimum of 4 consecutive morning hours per participant per week for 12 weeks of baseline and 12 weeks of intervention.ResultsThere was a significant increase in the frequency that choice was offered for 3 of the 4 targeted morning care areas from baseline to intervention: (1) out of bed, 21% to 33% (P < .001); dressing, 20% to 32% (P < .001); incontinence care, 18% to 23%, (P < .014). Dining location (8% to 13%) was not significant. There was also a significant increase in the amount of NA staff time to provide care from baseline to intervention (8.01 ± 9.0 to 9.68 ± 9.9 minutes per person, P < .001).ConclusionA staff training intervention improved the frequency with which NAs offered choice during morning care but also required more time. Despite significant improvements, choice was still offered one-third or less of the time during morning care.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号