首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

BIA法评估维持性血液透析患者水平衡及干体质量
引用本文:陆玮,季刚,陈舜杰,吴谷奋,蒋更如.BIA法评估维持性血液透析患者水平衡及干体质量[J].上海交通大学学报(医学版),2010,30(1):76-79.
作者姓名:陆玮  季刚  陈舜杰  吴谷奋  蒋更如
作者单位:上海交通大学医学院新华医院肾脏内科,上海,200092
摘    要:目的采用全身生物电阻抗分析(BIA)法评估维持性血液透析(MHD)患者水平衡动态变化及于体质量。方娃选择血液透析龄≥1年且病情稳定的20例MHD患者作为研究对象(MHD组),分别于血液透析前后及透析间期(透析后24h和48h)采用BIA法测定细胞外液量(ECW)和细胞内液量(ICW),计算并获得相关指标;分析MHD患者0h达到干体质量与否及其平均每日尿量对ECW和ICW的影响。以20名健康志愿者作为正常对照组。结果与正常对照组比较,MHD组透析前理想体质量纠正的ECW明显升高(P〈0.05)。在MHD组中,血液透析后ECW较透析前明显下降(P〈0.05);与透析前和透析间期比较,血液透析后ECW/机体总水量(TBW)降低,ICW/TBW升高,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05);各时间点ICW和ECW与患者相应体质量显著相关;达到干体质量患者0h和24h时间点理想体质量纠正的ICW和ECW均明显高于未达到干体质量患者(P〈0.05);尿量〈400mL/d的患者透析前和透析后24h,ECW和ICW均显著低于尿量≥400mL/d的患者(P〈0.05)。结论BIA法研究提示,MHD患者血液透析前后及透析间期水平衡动态变化以ECW为主,评价指标以ECW/TBW较为敏感;理想体质量纠正的ICW和ECW可能是评判干体质量的敏感指标。

关 键 词:维持性血液透析  全身生物电阻抗分析  干体质量  细胞内液  细胞外液

Evaluation of fluid balance and dry weight with BIA in patients with maintenance hemodialysis
LU Wei,JI Gang,CHEN Shun-jie,WU Gu-fen,JIANG Geng-ru.Evaluation of fluid balance and dry weight with BIA in patients with maintenance hemodialysis[J].Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University:Medical Science,2010,30(1):76-79.
Authors:LU Wei  JI Gang  CHEN Shun-jie  WU Gu-fen  JIANG Geng-ru
Institution:Department of Nephrology, Xinhua Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200092, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the fluid balance and dry weight with whole body bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in patients with maintenance hemodialysis ( MHD). Methods Twenty patients in stable condition with MHD for more than one year were selected ( MHD group). Extra-cellular water ( ECW) and intra-cellular water (ICW) were measured by BIA before hemodialysis, after hemodialysis and at intervals of hemodialysis (24 h and 48 h after hemodialysis), and related parameters were calculated. Whether patients with MHD achieved dry weight at 0 h was analysed, and the effects of average daily urine volume on ECW and ICW were explored. Another 20 healthy volunteers were served as controls. Results Compared with control group, ECW retrieved by ideal body weight was significantly higher before hemodialysis in MHD group (P<0.05). In MHD group, ECW was significantly lower after hemodialysis than that before hemodialysis (P < 0.05). ECW/total body water (TBW) was significantly lower and ICW/TBW was significantly higher after hemodialysis than those before hemodialysis and at intervals of hemodialysis ( P < 0.05). ICW and ECW at each time point were significantly related to body weight. ICW and ECW retrieved by ideal body weight at 0 h and 24 h of those who achieved dry weight were significantly higher than those who did not achieve dry weight ( P < 0.05). ECW and ICW before hemodialysis and 24 h after hemodialysis were significantly lower in those with urine volume <400 mL/d than those with urine volume ≥400 mL/d (P <0.05). Conclusion BIA analysis indicates that changes of fluid balance before hemodialysis, after hemodialysis and at intervals of hemodialysis in patients with MHD are characterized by ECW, and ECW/TBW is a more sensitive parameter. ICW and ECW retrieved by ideal body weight may be sensitive parameters to determine the dry weight in patients with MHD.
Keywords:maintenance hemodialysis  bioelectrical impedance analysis  dry weight  intra-cellular water  extra-cellular water
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号