Endorectal ultrasound-directed biopsy: a useful technique to detect local recurrence of rectal cancer |
| |
Authors: | Jeffrey J. Morken Nancy N. Baxter Robert D. Madoff Charles O. Finne III |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA;(2) 393 Dunlap Street North, Suite 500, St. Paul, MN 55104, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Aims This study assesses the value of endorectal ultrasound (ERUS)-directed biopsy in detecting local recurrence of rectal cancer.Methods We reviewed the records of patients undergoing ERUS by a single surgeon for surveillance after treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma. Lesions suggestive of local recurrence underwent ERUS-assisted core-needle biopsy (EAB) via a proctoscope after precise ERUS localization or direct ERUS-guided biopsy (EGB) via a B&K Medical probe.Results From 1991 to 2003, 525 patients underwent 2,490 surveillance ERUS. Of these patients, 51 underwent 62 biopsy sessions: 36 EGB and 26 EAB. The mean age of patients was 67.2 years (range 38–93 years); 22 (43%) were female. Only 11 patients (22%) had undergone prior radical resection of their primary tumor. No patient experienced a complication from the biopsies despite five being anticoagulated. Of 39 patients whose cancer recurrence was documented during follow-up, 32 (82%) were diagnosed at the initial biopsy session, and in five (13%), recurrence was detected only with ERUS. The combined sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EAB and EGB in detecting recurrence was 83, 100, and 87%, respectively. In 26 patients with local recurrence, resection was performed with curative intent.Conclusion ERUS with biopsy is useful in detecting local recurrence after treatment of rectal cancer. It is safe, with a high diagnostic yield. It may be particularly useful in patients at higher risk for local recurrence (i.e., after endocavitary radiation and local excision) and may allow early detection of local recurrence, thereby permitting attempts at curative resection.This study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee at the University of Minnesota and, therefore, has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Given the retrospective nature of this study, informed consent was not obtained (approved by our ethics committee). |
| |
Keywords: | Ultrasound Rectal Cancer Recurrent Biopsy Diagnosis |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|