Atrial Vulnerability in Patients with Paroxysmal "Lone" Atrial Fibrillation |
| |
Authors: | MARC ZIMMERMANN RICHARD ADAMEC JACQUES METZGER |
| |
Affiliation: | Cardiology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Geneva, and the Cardiology Unit, Hôpital de La Tour, Meyrin, Switzerland |
| |
Abstract: | Little is known about the electrophysiological properties of the atrium predisposing to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in patients without structural heart disease. This study was conducted to analyze intraatrial conduction, atrial refractoriness, and arrhythmia inducibility in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. An electrophysiological study was performed in 24 patients with a documented history of lone paroxysmal AF but in sinus rhythm at the time of the electrophysiological study. Twelve patients without any history of atrial arrhythmias served as controls. The patients with lone paroxysmal AF showed a significant prolonged local conduction time S1A1 (70 ± 21 ms vs 36 ± 12 ms, P < 0.0001), a lack of rate adaptation of the functional refractory period (FRP changes/cycle length changes < 10% in 15 of 24 patients with lone paroxysmal AF vs 1/12 controls, P = 0.002) and a higher incidence of inducible AF with only one extrastimulus (13/24 vs 0/12, P = 0.0014). The total P wave duration in the surface ECG (89 ± 14 ms vs 83 ± 8 ms, P = 0.15), the intraatrial conduction time (36 ± 14 ms vs 28 ± 8 ms, P = 0.07), the presence of a fragmented atrial electrogram (16/24 vs 7/12, P = 0.62), the absolute value of the effective refractory period (204 ± 28 ms vs 212 ± 23 ms, P = 0.42), and the vulnerability index (3.0 ± 1.5 vs 3.6 ± 1.5, P = 0.26) were not statistically different between the two groups. The presence of a prolonged (> 50 ms) S1A1 and/or the presence of a lack of rate adaptation of the FRP and/or the presence of inducible AF identified patients with spontaneous lone paroxysmal AF with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 67%, a positive predictive value of 85%, and a negative predictive value of 89%. In patients with lone paroxysmal AF. the electrophysiological study using conventional techniques allows not only to detect AF inducibility using a nonaggressive protocol, but also to reveal several electrophysiological abnormalities related to the atrial substrate itself. This atrial vulnerability may explain the high incidence of recurrences in patients with lone paroxysmal AF. |
| |
Keywords: | atrial fibrillation atrial arrhythmia electrical stimulation electrophysiology atrial vulnerabilit |
|
|