Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization,NMP22 bladderchek,and urinary liquid‐based cytology in the detection of bladder urothelial carcinoma

The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic values of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), NMP22 BladderChek, and liquid‐based cytology (LBC) in the detection of bladder urothelial carcinoma (UC). Consecutive voided urine samples were collected from 138 in‐house patients with a variety of urologic conditions and 37 healthy individuals as negative controls. FISH, NMP22 BladderChek, and LBC were performed on the specimens. All three tests were evaluated independently in a blinded fashion. In all, 104 out of the 175 patients enrolled in this study had histologically proven UC. LBC, FISH, and NMP22 BladderChek were successfully performed on 175, 149, and 119 cases, respectively. The three tests revealed overall sensitivities of 73.1%, 86.5%, and 67.6%, respectively. FISH was more sensitive than LBC (P=0.022) and NMP22 BladderChek (P=0.004). Combination of all the tests yielded a superior sensitivity of 96.7% compared with LBC (P<0.001), NMP22 BladderChek (P<0.001), and FISH (P=0.016), with the specificity only decreased slightly. Sensitivities of the three tests enhanced significantly with increasing UC grade (P<0.05). The positive rates of FISH and NMP22 BladderChek in equivocal cytologic diagnoses were 85.7% and 61.9% in UC, and 37.5% and 50.0% in non‐UC (FISH: P=0.021; NMP22 BladderChek: P=0.683). FISH was more sensitive than LBC and NMP22 BladderChek. FISH had the ability to clarify equivocal cytologic diagnoses. Combination of all three tests showed an improvement in the sensitivity compared to any single test alone in detecting UC with the specificity slightly decreased. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2013;41:852–857. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.