首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国生育政策的文本量化分析——基于政策工具、政策包容性、政策力度的三维分析框架
引用本文:杨嘉乐,王睿娟,陈虹宇,梁晓晖. 中国生育政策的文本量化分析——基于政策工具、政策包容性、政策力度的三维分析框架[J]. 中国卫生政策研究, 2023, 16(9): 15-21
作者姓名:杨嘉乐  王睿娟  陈虹宇  梁晓晖
作者单位:1. 武汉大学公共卫生学院;2. 武汉大学全球健康研究中心
摘    要:目的:对我国实施全面二孩政策以来的生育政策进行文本量化分析,为完善我国生育政策提供建议。方法:检索2016年以来发布的国家层面的生育政策文本,构建政策工具、政策包容性、政策力度三维分析框架,并对政策文本进行多维度及交叉对比分析。结果:本文共纳入45份政策文本,命令及规制性工具、能力建设性工具、激励性工具和信息及劝诫性工具占比依次为50.90%、39.16%、9.34%和9.94%;政策文本在尊重生育理念、促进生育公平、提升社会福祉三个政策包容性类型上分别占比12.14%、20.39%、67.48%;我国生育政策力度平均得分为2.67。结论:生育政策的政策工具内部均衡性不足,激励性与信息及劝诫性工具的使用有待加强;政策包容性类型丰富但使用不均衡,需要进一步促进性别平等和生育公平;政策力度整体偏弱,且与政策主体协调性不足,应进一步深化多部门参与协作,从财政、教育、文化等多个层面落实好生育配套措施,创建生育友好型社会。

关 键 词:生育政策  文本分析  政策工具  政策包容性  政策力度
收稿时间:2023-07-03
修稿时间:2023-08-16

Text quantitative study of China's fertility policy: A three-dimensional analysis framework based on policy tools, policy inclusiveness, and policy strength
YANG Jia-le,WANG Rui-juan,CHEN Hong-yu,LIANG Xiao-hui. Text quantitative study of China's fertility policy: A three-dimensional analysis framework based on policy tools, policy inclusiveness, and policy strength[J]. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 2023, 16(9): 15-21
Authors:YANG Jia-le  WANG Rui-juan  CHEN Hong-yu  LIANG Xiao-hui
Affiliation:School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei 430072, China;Global Health Institute, Wuhan University, Wuhan Hubei 430072, China
Abstract:Objective: The study is to provide suggestions for improving China''s fertility policy system on the basis of a text quantitative analysis of China''s fertility policy texts since the implementation of the universal two-child policy. Methods: Upon retrieving policy texts released by State or central-level fertility after 2016, a three-dimensional analysis framework of policy tools, policy inclusiveness, and policy strength is constructed, within which multidimensional and cross-comparative analyses of policy texts were conducted. Results: A total of 45 policy texts are included, and the percentages of command and regulation tools, capacity construction tools, incentive tools, and information exhortation tools are 50.90%, 39.16%, 9.34%, and 9.94%, respectively; the percentages of policy texts falling into policy inclusiveness type regarding respect of concept of fertility, promotion of fertility equity, and enhancement of social well-being are 12.14%, 20.39%, and 67.48% respectively; the average strength of fertility policy scores 2.67. Conclusion: The internal balance of policy tools of fertility policy is insufficient, and the application of motivational and exhortation tools needs to be strengthened; policy inclusiveness is abundant but unevenly used, and gender equality and fertility equity need to be further promoted ; the overall policy strength is weak and coordination with policy subjects is insufficient, and multi-sectoral participation and collaboration should be further deepened, and supporting measures for childbirth should be implemented from the perspectives of finance, education, and culture to create a fertility-friendly society.
Keywords:Fertility policy  Text analysis  Policy tools  Policy inclusiveness  Policy strength
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号