Differential Performance of SF-36 Items in Healthy Adults With and Without Functional Limitations |
| |
Authors: | Willi Horner-Johnson Gloria L. Krahn Rie Suzuki Jana J. Peterson Gale Roid Trevor Hall RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement |
| |
Affiliation: | a Oregon Institute on Disability & Development and the Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR b National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA c Department of Health Sciences & Administration, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI d Independent psychometric consultant, Vancouver, WA e Northwest Neurobehavioral Health, Boise, ID |
| |
Abstract: | Horner-Johnson W, Krahn GL, Suzuki R, Peterson JJ, Roid G, Hall T, the RRTC Expert Panel on Health Measurement. Differential performance of SF-36 items in healthy adults with and without functional limitations.ObjectiveTo determine whether Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) items show differential item functioning among healthy adults with various types of functional limitations as compared with a healthy sample with no identified limitations.DesignSurvey responses were analyzed by using partial correlations.SettingGeneral community.ParticipantsParticipants (N=206) included (1) adults with spinal cord injury (SCI), (2) adults who were deaf or hard of hearing, (3) adults who were legally blind, (4) adults with psychiatric or emotional conditions, and (5) adults with no reported functional limitations. Participants were screened to ensure the absence of substantial health problems.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasureSF-36.ResultsPartial correlations showed a significant negative correlation, indicating differential item functioning (ie, apparent bias) for people with SCI on all 10 SF-36 Physical Functioning items. For people who were blind, 5 items showed a significant negative correlation. Two items had significant negative correlations for the deaf/hard-of-hearing group. One item showed significant negative performance for people with mental health conditions.ConclusionsOur data indicated a possibility for measurement bias caused by the blending of health and function concepts in the SF-36. |
| |
Keywords: | Bias Disabled persons Health surveys Rehabilitation |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|