首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Comparison of the Responsiveness of the FIM and the interRAI Post Acute Care Assessment Instrument in Rehabilitation of Older Adults
Authors:Christine Glenny  Paul Stolee  Janice Husted  Mary Thompson  Katherine Berg
Affiliation:a Department of Health Studies and Gerontology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
b Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
c Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Abstract:Glenny C, Stolee P, Husted J, Thompson M, Berg K. Comparison of the responsiveness of the FIM and the interRAI Post Acute Care Assessment Instrument in rehabilitation of older adults.

Objective

To compare the responsiveness of 2 major systems developed for rehabilitation settings—the FIM and the interRAI Post Acute Care (PAC) assessment—in older patients.

Design

Trained raters assessed patients with both tools at admission and discharge.

Setting

Musculoskeletal (MSK) and geriatric rehabilitation units (GRUs) in 2 rehabilitation hospitals.

Participants

Older adults receiving rehabilitation (N=208; mean age ± SD, 78.5±9.3; 67% women).

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Responsiveness was evaluated using effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM).

Results

ES and SRM were somewhat higher for the FIM motor (GRU ES=1.68, SRM=1.31; MSK ES=2.12, SRM=2.25) than the PAC (GRU ES=1.64, SRM=1.29; MSK ES=1.57, SRM=1.89) in both patient groups. Both tools were more responsive in MSKs than GRUs. This may reflect the greater frailty and clinical complexity of GRU patients.

Conclusions

Both the FIM motor and the PAC were able to detect clinically relevant improvement in functional ability in older rehabilitation inpatients.
Keywords:Activities of daily living   Geriatric assessment   Rehabilitation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录！
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号