首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

肝癌千伏级CBCT引导放疗配准方法比较
引用本文:王建廷,刘明,翟福山,王安峰,曹晓辉,包超恩. 肝癌千伏级CBCT引导放疗配准方法比较[J]. 中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 24(4): 444-448. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.04.023
作者姓名:王建廷  刘明  翟福山  王安峰  曹晓辉  包超恩
作者单位:050051 石家庄,河北医科大学第三医院肿瘤科
基金项目:河北省指令性课题项目(20110105)
摘    要:目的 比较肝癌千伏级CBCT图像与计划CT图像配准的不同方法。方法 离线下由4位观测者在加速器控制室内分别完成121幅CBCT图像与计划CT图像的配准,配准方法包括手动配准、常规软组织配准、常规骨性配准、肝脏配准、椎体配准,其中后4种方法均使用配准软件自动配准。对配准软件的稳定性进行检测,然后比较4位观测者使用同种自动配准方法结果,以此评估使用该方法可重复性。以4位观测者手动配准肝脏外轮廓结果平均值为基准,与其他配准方法结果比较。使用McNemar检验差异。结果 若保持配准条件不变,自动配准结果完全一致。常规软组织、骨性配准方法可重复性较好,椎体配准次之,肝脏配准最差。但肝脏配准结果与手动配准结果最接近,差值在3 mm内百分率分别为左右方向84.3%、上下方向 77.7%、前后方向92.6%。结论 使用配准软件自动肝脏配准可用于肝癌图像引导,但每次图像引导时均需有经验医师、技师共同参与,自动配准完成之后应根据肝脏外轮廓手动校正。

关 键 词:肝肿瘤/图像引导放射疗法  体层摄影术  X线计算机  锥形束  图像配准  
收稿时间:2013-12-27

Comparing different image registration methods in kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for liver cancer
Wang Jianting,Liu Ming,Zhai Fushan,Wang Anfeng,Cao Xiaohui,Bao Chaoen. Comparing different image registration methods in kilovolt cone-beam computed tomography image-guided radiotherapy for liver cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology, 2015, 24(4): 444-448. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4221.2015.04.023
Authors:Wang Jianting  Liu Ming  Zhai Fushan  Wang Anfeng  Cao Xiaohui  Bao Chaoen
Affiliation:Department of Oncology, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
Abstract:Objective To study the methods of matching kilovolt CBCT image with planning CT scan. Methods A total of 121 CBCT scans were matched with planning CT scan using a manual and four automatic match methods by four observers in the offline. In the manual match, the live contour was used as a surrogate for image registration. Four automatic match methods, including routine soft-tissue match, routine bone match, automatic liver match and vertebral body match, were performed using image registration sofeware. First, the stability of the sofeware was tested. Then, the reproducibility of the same automatic match method was evaluated by comparing different observers’ match results. After the manual match by four observers, the mean of the match results was used as a standard to compare with others. The differerces was test by McNemar method. Results In the uniform match factors, automatic match result would not change. The reproducibility of routine soft-tissue and bone match are best, automatic vertebral body match is better than automatic liver match. Howerver, the automatic liver match result is the most similar to manual match, the percentages of match result have an absolute error no more than 3 mm in left-right, superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions are 84.3%, 77.7% and 92.6%. Conclusions Automatic liver match can be used in image-guided radiotherapy for liver cancer, however, it should be performed by experienced oncologist and technologist together in each fraction, after that, the matching result should be adjusted carefully according to live contour.
Keywords:Liver neoplasms/image-guided radiotherapy  Tomography  X-ray computed  cone-beam  Image registration  
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号