首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Comparison of Mandibular Advancement Splint and Tongue Stabilizing Device in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Authors:Sheryn A Deane  Peter A Cistulli  Andrew T Ng  Biao Zeng  Peter Petocz  M Ali Darendeliler
Institution:1.Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Sydney Dental Hospital, Sydney, Australia;2.Centre for Sleep Health & Research, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;3.Centre for Sleep Disorders and Respiratory Failure, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia;4.Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Abstract:

Study Objectives:

To compare the efficacy of a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) and a novel tongue stabilizing device (TSD) in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

Design:

A randomized crossover design was used.

Patients:

Twenty-seven patients (20 male, 7 female), recruited from a tertiary hospital sleep clinic.

Measurements and Results:

The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was reduced with MAS (11.68 ± 8.94, P = 0.000) and TSD (13.15 ± 10.77, P = 0.002) compared with baseline (26.96 ± 17.17). The arousal index decreased for MAS (21.09 ± 9.27, P = 0.004) and TSD (21.9 ± 10.56, P = 0.001) compared with baseline (33.23 ± 16.41). Sixty-eight percent of patients achieved a complete or partial response with MAS, compared with 45% with TSD. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was decreased with MAS (P = <0.001) and TSD (P = 0.002). Subjective improvements in snoring and quality of sleep were reported, with a better response for MAS than TSD. Compliance was poorer for TSD, and the side effect profiles of the 2 modalities were different. All patients were satisfied with MAS compared to TSD, and 91% of patients preferred the MAS.

Conclusion:

Objective testing showed the MAS and TSD had similar efficacy in terms of AHI reduction. Patients reported improvements with both devices; however, better compliance and a clear preference for MAS was apparent when both devices were offered. Longer term studies are needed to clarify the role of TSD.

Citation:

Deane SA; Cistulli PA; Ng AT; Zeng B; Petocz P; Darendeliler MA. Comparison of mandibular advancement splint and tongue stabilizing device in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. SLEEP 2009;32(5):648-653.
Keywords:mandibular advancement splint  tongue stabilizing device  obstructive sleep apnea
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号