A randomised prospective trial comparing daily paracentesis and intravenous albumin with recirculation in diuretic refractory ascites

We report a randomised trial in 40 consecutive patients with diuretic refractory ascites comparing our standard therapy of ascites recirculation (Rhodiascit apparatus) with the newly proposed method of daily paracentesis (3-4 litre) and intravenous albumin infusion. A mean of five (range 2-13) paracenteses removed 13.3 (2.0-36.0) l of ascites. 12 (5-32) h of recirculation produced 6.0 (2.0-12.0) l of waste. A significant diuresis occurred in 14 recirculation patients compared to four treated by paracentesis. No significant changes in electrolyte levels or renal function occurred. Complications were commoner with paracentesis (12) than with recirculation (5). Following recirculation, 18 patients were discharged after 7 (2-21) days; significantly (p less than 0.04) shorter than after paracentesis (11 (4-34) days, 16 discharges). Ascites reaccumulation and survival were identical in both groups. Fewer complications, shorter hospital stay and lower consumables costs (recirculation 240 pounds, paracentesis 400 pounds) make ascites recirculation an attractive therapeutic option to daily paracentesis and intravenous albumin in diuretic refractory ascites.