首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Extranodal extension in node-positive bladder cancer: the continuing controversy
Authors:Jeong In Gab  Ro Jae Y  Kim Seong Cheol  You Dalsan  Song Cheryn  Hong Jun Hyuk  Ahn Hanjong  Kim Choung-Soo
Institution:Department of Urology, Asan Medical Centre, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract:Study Type – Therapy (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Although extranodal extension in node‐positive patients may provide prognostic information in certain urological malignancies, contradictory results have been reported in node‐positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. We examined whether extranodal extension could have an impact on the outcomes of node‐positive patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in a single large tertiary hospital. We have shown that the presence of extranodal extension was not an independent prognostic factor in node‐positive patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE

? To examine whether extranodal extension (ENE) has an impact on the outcome of node‐positive patients who underwent radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

? Of 543 consecutive patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder between 1990 and 2007, 112 patients with lymph node metastasis detected on histological examination were evaluated with regard to recurrence‐free survival (RFS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) based on ENE status.

RESULTS

? The overall 5‐year RFS and DSS rates were 22.3% and 33.8%, respectively. ENE was observed in 41 (36.6%) of the 112 patients. ? The presence of ENE was associated with advanced pathological nodal status (P= 0.004), more positive lymph nodes (P= 0.006), and higher lymph node density (P < 0.001). ? The incidence of positive ENE increased with large positive lymph node diameter (P < 0.001). ? Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node density (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.39, 95% CI 1.09–5.24, P= 0.029; and HR = 3.13, 1.43–6.84, P= 0.004) and use of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR = 1.80, 1.02–3.20, P= 0.041; and HR = 2.07, 1.13–3.79, P= 0.018) were significant predictors of RFS and DSS, respectively. ? After adjustment for other prognostic factors, ENE was not significantly related to RFS (P= 0.825) and DSS (P= 0.961) by multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

? The presence of ENE was not an independent prognostic factor in node‐positive patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. ? Additional prospective studies are needed to determine the independent prognostic role of ENE.
Keywords:lymph nodes  neoplasm metastasis  prognosis  urinary bladder neoplasms
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号