首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

11家区县医院危急重症救治能力的比较分析
引用本文:陈勇坚,简伟研,胡牧,张修梅. 11家区县医院危急重症救治能力的比较分析[J]. 中国医院管理, 2012, 32(1): 38-40
作者姓名:陈勇坚  简伟研  胡牧  张修梅
作者单位:1. 江门市中心医院 广东江门529030
2. 北京大学医学部公共卫生学院 北京 100191
3. 北京大学第三临床医学院 北京 100191
4. 北京市公共卫生信息中心 北京 100050
摘    要:目的评估北京市远郊区县区域中心医院危重病例救治能力。方法从北京市公共卫生信息中心"北京市出院病人病案首页数据库"收集11家远郊区县区域中心医院2008年的"心肌梗死"、"消化道出血"、"中风伴严重并发症"和"多发性创伤"4类出院病例。以"回原住地率"为正向指标,同时利用死亡和转院信息构建"未能救治率"作为负向指标,对医院的危重病例救治能力进行评价。结果综合正向和负向指标,在11家区域中心医院中,医院C的危重病例救治能力最强,而A的危重病例救治能力最弱。结论利用客观的出院转归指标,便于不同医疗机构之间的横向比较,有助于得到较为可靠的医疗服务能力评估结果。

关 键 词:出院转归  救治能力  危重病例

Comparing the Treatment Capacity of Catastrophic Disease among Eleven Regional County Level Hospitals
Affiliation:CHEN Yong-jian, JIAN Wei-yan, HU Mu. et al. Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, 529030, China
Abstract:Objective To estimate severe diseases therapy capability of center hospitals in rural Beijing. Method The data came from the Database of Inpatient Records in Beijing commissioned by Beijing Public Health Center. The cases who had myocardial infarction, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, stroke with serious complications or multiple significant trauma in 2008 were collected. The "rate of coming back home" and the "rate of cannot-therapy" were used to assess the therapy capability, and the former indicator is positive and the latter indicator is negative. Result Through considering the positive and the negative indicators together, Hospital C had the best capability to treat severe diseases, while such ca- pability of Hospital A was worst among these eleven center hospitals. Conclusion The objective indicators of inpatient healthcare output make it convenient for horizontal comparison among different hospitals, so that the evaluation of healthcare capacity based on these indicators are more reliable.
Keywords:inpatient output   therapy capability   catastrophic disease
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号