首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

联合火针治疗斑秃增加效应的Meta分析
引用本文:戴婷,宋宁静,许瑾,孙晓颖,李福伦,李欣,李斌.联合火针治疗斑秃增加效应的Meta分析[J].中华全科医学,2020,18(10):1750.
作者姓名:戴婷  宋宁静  许瑾  孙晓颖  李福伦  李欣  李斌
作者单位:1. 复旦大学附属儿科医院皮肤科, 上海 201102;
基金项目:国家重点研发计划“中医药现代化研究”重点专项(2018YFC1705303)长宁区卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(20174Y003)长宁区医疗卫生科研专项(CNKW2018Y08)皮肤病教育部重点实验室白癜风精准医学研究开放课题(AYV2018-1-005)
摘    要:目的 对联合火针治疗斑秃临床研究的增加效应进行系统评价。 方法 检索中国知网(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、万方数据库(WF)及Pubmed数据库,检索日期至2019年1月16日,辅以手工检索,纳入评价联合火针治疗斑秃增加效应的对照试验,提取数据使用CMA软件进行统计分析。 结果 共检索到73篇文献,其中7篇对照研究符合纳入标准,累计纳入病例490例(联合火针组263例、对照组227例),比较了联合火针治疗组与常规治疗组对斑秃疗效的差异。Meta分析结果显示,在斑秃治愈率RR=1.456,95%CI(1.171~1.810)]、显效率RR=1.199,95%CI(1.055~1.364)]及有效率RR=1.101,95%CI(1.041~1.165)]方面,联合火针治疗组均明显优于对照组。基础治疗为局部治疗者,增加火针治疗对治愈率、显效率和有效率均有显著提高;基础治疗为系统治疗者,火针治疗组仅对有效率有显著提高。2组不良事件发生率差异无统计学意义RR=1.040,95%CI(0.267~4.055)],未显示严重不良事件。 结论 联合火针治疗斑秃与对照组相比疗效增加效应显著,安全性好。 

关 键 词:火针    斑秃    对照试验    增加效应    Meta分析
收稿时间:2019-08-04

Meta analysis of the add-on effect of combined fire needle on alopecia areata
Institution:Department of Dermatology, Childrens Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 201102, China
Abstract:Objective To systematically evaluate the add-on effect of fire needle therapy compared to conventional treatment on alopecia areata. Methods Retrieval of CNKI, VIP, WF and PubMed databases to January 16, 2019 was included in control trial to evaluate the add-on effect of combined fire needle therapy on alopecia areata. The data were collected and analyzed by CMA software. Results A total of 73 literatures were retrieved, of which 7 control studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 490 cases included(263 cases in the combined fire needle group and 227 cases in the control group). Overall, add-on therapy of combined fire needle showed consistent benefit in the cure rateRR=1.456, 95% CI(1.171, 1.810)], apparent efficiencyRR=1.199, 95% CI(1.055, 1.364)] and effective rateRR=1.101, 95% CI(1.041, 1.165)]. According to subgroup analysis, when the basic treatment was local therapy, fire needle showed add-on effect on increasing the fire needle treatment can significantly improve the cure rate, apparent efficiency and effective rate;when the basic treatment were systemic therapy, fire needle only showed add-on effect on effective rate. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groupsRR=1.040, 95% CI(0.267, 4.055)]. No serious adverse events were found. Conclusion Compared with the control group, the add-on effect of combined fire needle on alopecia areata is significant and safe. 
Keywords:
点击此处可从《中华全科医学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华全科医学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号