首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

腹腔热灌注化疗在非根治性阑尾来源低级别腹膜假黏液瘤中的应用价值CSCD
引用本文:史冠军,夏奥,安鲁彪,翟喜超,马瑞卿,卢一艳,庞少军,蔡莺,王冰,陈峰,许洪斌. 腹腔热灌注化疗在非根治性阑尾来源低级别腹膜假黏液瘤中的应用价值CSCD[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(10): 766-770. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0012
作者姓名:史冠军  夏奥  安鲁彪  翟喜超  马瑞卿  卢一艳  庞少军  蔡莺  王冰  陈峰  许洪斌
作者单位:1. 100049 北京,航天中心医院黏液瘤科;2. 100049 北京,航天中心医院病理科
基金项目:航天中心医院科研基金(20190301-YN-09);首都卫生发展科研专项基金(2020-4-6083)
摘    要:目的探讨腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)在非根治性阑尾来源低级别腹膜假黏液瘤(PMP)中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析300例非根治性阑尾来源低级别PMP患者的临床资料,分析其预后影响因素及HIPEC对其治疗价值。结果237例接受术中HIPEC治疗的患者10年生存率显著高于未接受HIPEC治疗的患者(52%vs.26%,P<0.001);同时接受术中及术后HIPEC治疗的患者10年生存率显著高于单纯接受术中HIPEC治疗的患者(57%vs.44%,P=0.004)。单因素分析显示HIPEC、根治程度、减瘤前PCI>30、减瘤后PCI>30、CA19-9异常为预后影响因素。多因素分析结果提示未接受术中HIPEC治疗以及CA125异常为预后不良的独立危险因素。结论对于无法达到完全减瘤的阑尾来源低级别PMP患者,姑息性减瘤术联合HIPEC治疗仍可显著改善远期预后。

关 键 词:腹腔热灌注化疗  腹膜假黏液瘤  低级别  非根治切除  最大限度减瘤术
收稿时间:2020-01-06

Therapeutic Value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy on Non-radical Appendiceal Low-grade Pseudomyxoma Peritonei
SHI Guanjun,XIA Ao,AN Lubiao,ZHAI Xichao,MA Ruiqing,LU Yiyan,PANG Shaojun,CAI Ying,WANG Bing,CHEN Feng,XU Hongbin. Therapeutic Value of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy on Non-radical Appendiceal Low-grade Pseudomyxoma Peritonei[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(10): 766-770. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.20.0012
Authors:SHI Guanjun  XIA Ao  AN Lubiao  ZHAI Xichao  MA Ruiqing  LU Yiyan  PANG Shaojun  CAI Ying  WANG Bing  CHEN Feng  XU Hongbin
Affiliation:1. Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China; 2. Department of Pathology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the application value of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy(HIPEC) on non-radical appendiceal low-grade pseudomyxoma peritonei(PMP). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 300 patients with non-radical appendiceal-origin low-grade PMP, and the prognostic factors and therapeutic value of HIPEC. Results The 10-year overall survival(OS) of 237 cases treated with HIPEC was significantly higher than that without HIPEC (52% vs. 26%, P<0.001); the 10-year OS of the patients treated with intra- and post-operative HIPEC was also significantly higher than that with intraoperative HIPEC (57% vs. 44%, P=0.004). Univariate analysis showed that HIPEC, radical degree, PCI>30 before tumor reduction, PCI>30 after tumor reduction and CA199 abnormality were prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed that without HIPEC and CA125 abnormality were independent risk factors for poor prognosis. Conclusion For appendiceal low-grade PMP patients who cannot achieve complete cytoreduction, palliative maximal cytoreductive combined with HIPEC could significantly improve the long-term prognosis.
Keywords:Hyperthermia intraperitoneal chemotherapy  Pseudomyxoma peritonei(PMP)  Low-grade  Nonradical resection  Maximal cytoreductive  
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号