首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

碳离子和质子治疗胰腺癌安全性和有效性的系统评价及Meta分析
引用本文:廖亦然,张秋宁,邵丽华,刘锐锋,罗宏涛,王丽娜,冯双午,杨克虎,王小虎. 碳离子和质子治疗胰腺癌安全性和有效性的系统评价及Meta分析[J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2020, 47(7): 504-511. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.1482
作者姓名:廖亦然  张秋宁  邵丽华  刘锐锋  罗宏涛  王丽娜  冯双午  杨克虎  王小虎
作者单位:1. 730000 兰州,兰州大学第一临床医学院;2. 730000 兰州,中国科学院近代物理研究所生物医学中心;3. 730000 兰州,兰州重离子医院;4. 730000 兰州,兰州大学基础医学院
基金项目:兰州市人才创新创业项目(2017-RC-23)
摘    要:目的评价碳离子和质子治疗胰腺癌(PaC)的安全性和有效性。方法检索数据库纳入碳离子和质子治疗PaC的临床研究,检索时间为自建库至2019年6月。两位研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料。采用STATA 12.0和MetaAnalyst Beta 3.13软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入8篇文献,包含459例PaC患者。效应模型Meta分析显示,碳离子和质子治疗PaC的2、3、5级胃肠道溃疡发生率分别为7%、2%、0;2、3、4级厌食症发生率分别为6%、3%、0;1、2年总生存率(OS)分别为77%、45%;2年局部控制率为81%;1年无局部进展率为88%;1年局部复发率为15%。碳离子和质子治疗PaC的2、3、2~3级胃肠道溃疡发生率分别为6.8%、1.5%、9.2%和3.5%、8.3%、6.1%(均P>0.05);1、2年OS分别为77.1%、44.4%和77.6%、49.7%(P均>0.05)。结论碳离子和质子治疗PaC安全有效,两者的安全性和有效性相似。

关 键 词:碳离子  质子  胰腺癌  系统评价  Meta分析
收稿时间:2019-11-28

Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Ion and Proton Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
LIAO Yiran,ZHANG Qiuning,SHAO Lihua,LIU Ruifeng,LUO Hongtao,WANG Li'na,FENG Shuangwu,YANG Kehu,WANG Xiaohu. Safety and Efficacy of Carbon Ion and Proton Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Cancer Research on Prevention and Treatment, 2020, 47(7): 504-511. DOI: 10.3971/j.issn.1000-8578.2020.19.1482
Authors:LIAO Yiran  ZHANG Qiuning  SHAO Lihua  LIU Ruifeng  LUO Hongtao  WANG Li'na  FENG Shuangwu  YANG Kehu  WANG Xiaohu
Affiliation:1. The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China; 2. Biomedical Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Lanzhou 730000, China; 3. Lanzhou Heavy Ion Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China; 4. School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of carbon ion and proton therapies for pancreatic cancer (PaC). Methods The databases were electronically searched to collect the studies about the carbon ion and proton therapies for PaC from inception to June 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature and extracted data. A Meta-analysis was performed by STATA 12.0 and MetaAnalyst Beta 3.13 software. Results A total of 8 studies involving 459 PaC patients were included. The incidence of grade 2, 3 and 5 gastrointestinal (GI) ulcer toxicities in PaC patients treated with carbon ion and proton therapies were 7%, 2% and 0; the incidence of grade 2, 3 and 4 anorexia toxicities were 6%, 3.2% and 0; the 1- and 2-year OS rates were 77% and 45%; the 2-year local control (LC), 1-year freedom from local progression (FFLP) and 1-year local recurrence(LR) rates were 81%, 88% and 15%. The incidence of grade 2, 3, 2-3 GI ulcer toxicities in carbon ion and proton therapies for PaC were 6.8%, 1.5%, 9.2% and 3.5%, 8.3%, 6.1% (P>0.05); and the 1- and 2-year OS were 77.1%, 44.4% and 77.6%, 49.7% (P>0.05). Conclusion Carbon ion and proton therapies for PaC are safe and effective; and the security and effectiveness of the two methods are similar.
Keywords:Carbon ion  Meta-analysis  Pancreatic cancer  Proton  Systematic review
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《肿瘤防治研究》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号