首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

腹腔镜单纯尿道前壁加强法与尿道前后壁加强法(Sandwich法)改善前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的对比分析
引用本文:樊笑琪,刘志斌,王明帅,瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫,宋黎明,邢念增,牛亦农.腹腔镜单纯尿道前壁加强法与尿道前后壁加强法(Sandwich法)改善前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的对比分析[J].首都医学院学报,2020,41(4):542-546.
作者姓名:樊笑琪  刘志斌  王明帅  瓦斯里江·瓦哈甫  宋黎明  邢念增  牛亦农
作者单位:首都医科大学泌尿外科研究所 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科,北京100020;无锡市第九人民医院泌尿外科,江苏无锡214100;国家癌症中心 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心 中国医学科学院北京协和医学院肿瘤医院,北京100021
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81770754),北京市自然科学基金(7172081)。
摘    要:目的 探讨腹腔镜单纯尿道前壁悬吊加强法和尿道前后壁加强法对前列腺癌根治术后早期尿控的疗效。方法 纳入自2014年2月至2019年12月,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院泌尿外科收治的99例前列腺癌患者,其中56例采用尿道前后壁加强法治疗,43例采用单纯尿道前壁悬吊加强法治疗,比较两组患者的年龄、体质量指数、前列腺体积、术前前列腺特异性抗原(prostate specific antigen,PSA),临床分期、手术时间、病理分期、Gleason评分、淋巴结阳性率、术后切缘阳性率及通过电话随访拔除尿管后第2、4、12、24、52周时的尿控恢复情况。结果 两组患者的年龄、体质量指数、前列腺体积、PSA、临床分期、手术时间、病理分期、Gleason评分、淋巴结阳性率、术后切缘阳性率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),拔除尿管后第12周可见单纯尿道前壁悬吊加强法的治疗效果优于尿道前后壁加强法,但各指标差异仍无统计学意义(P=0.058)。结论 腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中采用前壁加强缝合悬吊法安全易行,与前后壁双重加强的方法相比,疗效接近。

关 键 词:腹腔镜  前列腺癌根治术  尿失禁  尿道前壁悬吊加强法
收稿时间:2020-04-27

Comparative analysis of the improvement of early urinary control after radical prostatectomy by laparoscopic anterior urethral wall reconstruction and "Sandwich" reconstruction
Fan Xiaoqi,Liu Zhibin,Wang Mingshuai,Wasilijiang·Wahafu,Song Liming,Xing Nianzeng,Niu Yinong.Comparative analysis of the improvement of early urinary control after radical prostatectomy by laparoscopic anterior urethral wall reconstruction and "Sandwich" reconstruction[J].Journal of Capital University of Medical Sciences,2020,41(4):542-546.
Authors:Fan Xiaoqi  Liu Zhibin  Wang Mingshuai  Wasilijiang·Wahafu  Song Liming  Xing Nianzeng  Niu Yinong
Institution:1. Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University;Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China;2. Department of Urology, Ninth People's Hospital, Wuxi 214100, Jiangsu Province, China;3. National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100020, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the effect of laparoscopic anterior urethral wall reconstruction and "Sandwich" reconstruction on early urinary control after radical prostatectomy. Methods A total of 99 patients with prostate cancer were enrolled from February 2014 to December 2019. Totally 56 patients were treated with "Sandwich" reconstruction, and 43 patients were treated with laparoscopic anterior urethral wall reconstruction. It was compared between the two groups with the age, body mass index, prostate volume, preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, operation time, pathological stage, Gleason score, lymph node positive rate, postoperative incisal margin positive rate and peripheral urinary control recovery. Results There was no significant difference in age, body mass index, prostate volume, PSA, clinical stage, operation time, pathological stage, Gleason score, lymph node positive rate, and postoperative incisors positive rate (P>0.05). At the 12th week after pulling out the urethral catheter, it was observed that the laparoscopic anterior urethral wall reconstruction was superior to the "Sandwich" reconstruction, but without statistically significance (P=0.058). Conclusion It is safe and easy to use the anterior urethral wall reconstruction in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, which is superior to the"Sandwich" reconstruction.
Keywords:laparoscopic  laparoscopic radical prostatectomy  incontinence  anterior urethral wall reconstruction  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《首都医学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号