Practical Clinical Evaluation of Stents |
| |
Authors: | THACH NGUYEN,M.D.,VIJAY DAVE,M.D.,SANQING JIA,M.D.,,CHEN FANG,M.D.,,LEFENG WANG,M.D.,,CHEN ZHANG,M.D.,&dagger ,JAMES NGUYEN&dagger &dagger ,NEAL FEARNOT,Ph.D.,§ SHIGERU SAITO,M.D.,§ § |
| |
Affiliation: | St. Mary Medical Center, Hobart, Indiana;Chao Yang Red Cross Hospital Beijing PR, China;Material Engineering and Education Center, Auburn University Alabama, Japan;University of California at Irvine, Kamakura, Japan;The Med Institute Inc, West Lafayette, Indiana;Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kamakura, Japan |
| |
Abstract: | This article discusses the clinical issues pertaining to an optimal stenting result and analyzes relevant stent structures and functions. There are five components of optimal stenting: favorable clinical features, easy stent delivery, ideal scaffolding, low stent thrombosis, and low restenosis. In straightforward cases, such as stenting in the mid-right coronary artery with a straight proximal segment, procedural success can be achieved with any stent. In vessels with curved, tortuous proximal segments, a highly flexible stent is needed for a smooth and successful delivery. For ostial, protected left main, or aortoanastomotic lesions, stents with sufficient radial strength and good visibility are needed. The two major concerns of an interventional cardiologist choosing a stent are excellent trackability for fast delivery and low long-term restenosis rate. In all situations, the procedural success depends on the operator's manual dexterity, experience with a particular stent design, and critical evaluation of different structural stent features to maximize benefits. Any new stent with high longitudinal flexibility, excellent scaffolding and radial strength, adequate radiopacity, complete deployment after one inflation, and that is easily recrossed and provides a good symmetrical conduit for a smooth coronary flow resulting in little tendency for thrombosis or restenosis would be today's stent of choice. |
| |
Keywords: | |
|
|