首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Drug-induced angioedema: experience of Italian emergency departments
Authors:G. Bertazzoni  M. T. Spina  M. G. Scarpellini  F. Buccelletti  M. De Simone  M. Gregori  V. Valeriano  FR Pugliese  M. P. Ruggieri  M. Magnanti  B. Susi  L. Minetola  L. Zulli  F. D’Ambrogio
Affiliation:1. Research Center on Evaluation and Promotion of Quality in Medicine “CEQUAM”, La Sapienza University, Viale Regina Elena 291, 00161, Rome, Italy
2. Post Graduate School of Emergency Medicine, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Umberto I Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
4. Department of Emergency Medicine, Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
5. Department of Emergency Medicine, S. Eugenio Hospital, Rome, Italy
6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy
7. Department of Emergency Medicine, S. Giovanni Hospital, Rome, Italy
8. Department of Emergency Medicine, Tor Vergata Hospital, Rome, Italy
9. Department of Emergency Medicine, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
Abstract:Acute angioedema represents a cause of admission to the emergency department requiring rapid diagnosis and appropriate management to prevent airway obstruction. Several drugs, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and oral antidiabetics, have been reported to induce angioedema. The aim of this prospective observational study conducted in a setting of routine emergency care was to evaluate the incidence and extent of drug-induced non-histaminergic angioedema in this specific clinical setting, and to identify the class of drugs possibly associated with angioedema. Patients admitted to seven different emergency departments (EDs) in Rome with the diagnosis of angioedema and urticaria were enrolled during a 6-month period. Of the 120,000 patients admitted at the EDs, 447 (0.37 %) were coded as having angioedema and 655 (0.5 %) as having urticaria. After accurate clinical review, 62 cases were defined as drug-induced, non-histaminergic angioedema. NSAIDs were the most frequent drugs (taken by 22 out of 62 patients) associated with the angioedema attack. Of the remaining patients, 15 received antibiotic treatment and 10 antihypertensive treatment. In addition, we observed in our series some cases of angioedema associated with drugs (such as antiasthmatics, antidiarrheal and antiepileptics) of which there are few descriptions in the literature. The present data, which add much needed information to the existing limited literature on drug-induced angioedema in the clinical emergency department setting, will provide more appropriate diagnosis and management of this potentially life-threatening adverse event.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号