Circulating Proteins Influencing Psychiatric Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study

BackgroundThere is a pressing need for novel drug targets for psychiatric disorders. Circulating proteins are potential candidates because they are relatively easy to measure and modulate and play important roles in signaling.MethodsWe performed two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to estimate the associations between circulating protein abundances and risk of 10 psychiatric disorders. Genetic variants associated with 1611 circulating protein abundances identified in 6 large-scale proteomic studies were used as genetic instruments. Effects of the circulating proteins on psychiatric disorders were estimated by Wald ratio or inverse variance–weighted ratio tests. Horizontal pleiotropy, colocalization, and protein-altering effects were examined to validate the assumptions of Mendelian randomization.ResultsNine circulating protein-to-disease associations withstood multiple sensitivity analyses. Among them, 2 circulating proteins had associations replicated in 3 proteomic studies. A 1 standard deviation increase in the genetically predicted circulating TIMP4 level was associated with a reduced risk of anorexia nervosa (minimum odds ratio [OR] = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.91) and bipolar disorder (minimum OR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94). A 1 standard deviation increase in the genetically predicted circulating ESAM level was associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia (maximum OR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.22–1.43). In addition, 58 suggestive protein-to-disease associations warrant validation with observational or experimental evidence. For instance, a 1 standard deviation increase in the ERLEC1-201-to-ERLEC1-202 splice variant ratio was associated with a reduced risk of schizophrenia (OR = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.90–0.97).ConclusionsPrioritized circulating proteins appear to influence the risk of psychiatric disease and may be explored as intervention targets.