首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Comparison of nonoperative versus operative management in pediatric gustilo-anderson type I open tibia fractures
Institution:1. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Birmingham, AL, United States;2. University of Utah, Department of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT;3. Children''s of Alabama, Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Birmingham, AL, United States;1. Intensive Care Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalar de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal;2. Intensive Care Unit, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain;1. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20814, United States;2. Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, JBSA Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, United States;3. Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, JBSA Ft. Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234, United States;1. Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA;2. R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;1. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA;3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Abstract:BackgroundRecent studies suggest pediatric Gustilo-Anderson type I fractures, especially of the upper extremity, may be adequately treated without formal operative debridement, though few tibial fractures have been included in these studies. The purpose of this study is to provide initial data suggesting whether Gustilo-Anderson type I tibia fractures may be safely treated nonoperatively.MethodsInstitutional retrospective review was performed for children with type I tibial fractures managed with and without operative debridement from 1999 through 2020. Incomplete follow-up, polytrauma, and delayed diagnosis of greater than 12 h since the time of injury were criteria for exclusion. Data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, management, time-to-antibiotic administration, and complications were recorded.ResultsThirty-three patients met inclusion criteria and were followed to union. Average age was 9.9 ± 3.7 years. All patients were evaluated in the emergency department and received intravenous antibiotics within 8 h of presentation. Median time-to-antibiotics was 2 h. All patients received cefazolin except one who received clindamycin at an outside hospital and subsequent cephalexin. Three patients (8.8%) received augmentation with gentamicin. Twenty-one patients (63.6%) underwent operative irrigation and debridement (I&D), and of those, sixteen underwent surgical fixation of their fracture. Twelve (36.4%) patients had bedside I&D with saline under conscious sedation, with one requiring subsequent operative I&D and intramedullary nailing. Three infections (14.3%) occurred in the operative group and none in the nonoperative group. Complications among the nonoperative patients include delayed union (8.3%), angulation (8.3%), and refracture (8.3%). Complications among the operative patients include delayed union (9.5%), angulation (14.3%), and one patient experienced both (4.8%). Other operative group complications include leg-length discrepancy (4.8%), heterotopic ossification (4.8%), and symptomatic hardware (4.8%).ConclusionNo infections were observed in a small group of children with type I tibia fractures treated with bedside debridement and antibiotics, and similar non-infectious complication rates were observed relative to operative debridement. This study provides initial data that suggests nonoperative management of type I tibial fractures may be safe and supports the development of larger studies.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号