Whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI vs. PET/CT in the assessment of bone lesions in oncological patients: initial results

Objectives

To compare [¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI with PET/CT for the assessment of bone lesions in oncologic patients.

Methods

This prospective study included 67 patients with solid tumours scheduled for PET/CT with [¹⁸?F]FDG who also underwent a whole-body PET/MRI scan. The datasets (PET/CT, PET/MRI) were rated by two readers regarding lesion conspicuity (four-point scale) and diagnostic confidence (five-point scale). Median scores were compared using the Wilcoxon test.

Results

Bone metastases were present in ten patients (15 %), and benign bone lesions in 15 patients (22 %). Bone metastases were predominantly localized in the pelvis (18 lesions, 38 %) and the spine (14 lesions, 29 %). Benign bone lesions were exclusively osteosclerotic and smaller than the metastases (mean size 6 mm vs. 23 mm). While PET/CT allowed identification of 45 of 48 bone metastases (94 %), PET/MRI allowed identification of all bone metastases (100 %). Conspicuity of metastases was high for both modalities with significantly better results using PET/MRI (p?p?Conclusions [¹⁸?F]FDG PET/MRI shows high potential for the assessment of bone metastases by offering superior lesion conspicuity when compared to PET/CT. In hypersclerotic, benign bone lesions PET/CT still sets the reference.

Key Points

? PET/MRI and PET/CT are of equal value for the identification of disease-positive patients ? PET/MRI offers higher lesion conspicuity as well as diagnostic confidence ? PET/MRI is an attractive new alternative for the assessment of bone metastases