首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


A Review of Methods to Assess Parental Feeding Practices and Preschool Children's Eating Behavior: The Need for Further Development of Tools
Authors:Blandine de Lauzon-Guillain  Andreia Oliveira  Marie A. Charles  Evangelia Grammatikaki  Louise Jones  Natalie Rigal  Carla Lopes  Yannis Manios  Pedro Moreira  Pauline Emmett  Sandrine Monnery-Patris
Affiliation:1. The Institute of Health & Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia;2. School of Exercise & Nutrition Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia;1. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA;2. Department of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA;1. Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, P.O. BOX 9104, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands;2. Department of Health Promotion, School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands;3. Trimbos Institute, PO Box?725, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands;4. Center for Obesity Research and Education, Department of Public Health, Temple University, 3223 N. Broad Street, Suite 175, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
Abstract:We reviewed tools developed to measure parental feeding practices and eating behavior and food intake or preferences of children aged 0 to 5 years. Two electronic literature databases (Medline and Psycinfo) were used to search for both observational and experimental studies in human beings. The articles selected for review were those presenting tools with data on internal consistency and/or test–retest reliability and/or construct validity. A total of 3,445 articles were retrieved, and further searching of reference lists and contact with experts produced an additional 18 articles. We identified three tools on the qualitative dimension of children's eating behavior, two tools on food intake or preferences, and one tool on parental feeding practices with rigorous testing of internal consistency, construct validity, and test–retest reliability. All other tools presented in this review need further evaluation of their validity or reliability. Because major gaps exist, we highlight the need for more tools on parental attention to children's hunger and satiety cues, and the need to evaluate the degree of control allowed to children younger than age 2 years in feeding events. Food avoidance (ie, behaviors or strategies to take away and to reject food) and food approach (ie, attractiveness for food stimuli) have not been assessed in children aged 12 to 24 months. Food preference tests based on sensory aspects rather than nutritional quality may be worth investigating. We identified a need for further evaluation of quality, especially test–retest reliability and construct validity, for most tools developed for use in studying children aged 0 to 5 years.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号