A systematic scoping review of measures of participation in disability and rehabilitation research: A preliminary report of findings |
| |
Authors: | Tom Seekins William Shunkamolah Michael Bertsche Colin Cowart Jean Ann Summers Amanda Reichard Glen White |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Graduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Parana, Rua Coracao de Maria, 92 Curitiba, Parana, Brazil;2. Research Group in Physical Activity and Quality of Life (GPAQ), Pontifical Catholic University of Parana, Rua Imaculada Conceicao, 1155 Curitiba, Brazil;3. Center for Geospatial Analytics, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, 2820 Faucette Drive, 27695 Raleigh, NC, United States;4. Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, 2820 Faucette Drive, 27695 Raleigh, NC, United States;5. Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense, Denmark;6. Prevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box, 1196 St. Louis, United States |
| |
Abstract: | Purpose/objectiveThe concept of participation is emerging as a gold-standard of outcome measurement in disability and rehabilitation. We aimed to assess the status of methods to measure this new concept.Method/designWe conducted a scoping review and a content analysis to assess the literature on participation.ResultsWe identified 586 articles addressing participation. Seventy-two articles passed all exclusion criteria. Twenty-four articles cited the International Classification of Function as their conceptual foundation. Most studies included individuals with a broad range of impairments (cross disability). Most instruments relied on self-report in a cross-sectional design. We noted three levels of measurement (static, interactional, and dynamic). Few studies reported collecting data on the environment along with participation. Subjective aspects of participation emerged as an important consideration but few articles reported measuring it.ConclusionsThe concept of participation represents more than a “shift from negative to more positive language.” It represents a transformational concept that requires new, dynamic measures collected in context. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|