Small renal cell carcinomas: correlation of size with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to correlate the size of renal cell carcinoma with tumor stage, nuclear grade, and histologic subtype in patients treated using partial or radical nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 213 consecutive renal cell carcinomas resected at our institution from 1995 through 1999. Three groups of lesions stratified by size (< or = 3 cm, > 3-5 cm, > 5 cm) were compared with regard to pathologic findings. Statistical significance was assessed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of 50 lesions 3 cm or smaller, 19 (38%) had extension outside the renal capsule (T3 or T4) and 14 (28%) were a high nuclear grade (Fuhrman grade 3 or 4). Lesions 3 cm or smaller and those greater than 3 cm to 5 cm did not differ statistically with regard to T stage or nuclear grade. Lesions larger than 5 cm showed a statistically higher T stage (p < 0.001) and nuclear grade (p = 0.001) than the other smaller lesions. More non-clear cell tumors were found in the two groups of smaller lesions (p = 0.105) but without statistical significance. The majority (58%) of the tumors were asymptomatic and had been detected incidentally on cross-sectional imaging. Lesions larger than 5 cm were significantly more likely to be symptomatic (p < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of the tumors 3 cm or smaller were incidental, and these lesions did not differ significantly from the symptomatic lesions with regard to stage, grade, or histology. CONCLUSION: In our study population, renal cell carcinomas up to 3 cm, including asymptomatic lesions, showed a significant incidence of high nuclear grade and tumor extension beyond the renal capsule; these findings support aggressive management of small lesions. Symptomatic status was not an adequate discriminator to guide management. A longitudinal study is necessary to further evaluate the efficacy of current patterns of therapy.