首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

氩氦刀或唑来膦酸单用及联合应用治疗骨转移癌疼痛对照研究
引用本文:李奋强,李立,王文辉,苏东君,常耀文,何学文,郭刚,李明祥,李宝华. 氩氦刀或唑来膦酸单用及联合应用治疗骨转移癌疼痛对照研究[J]. 介入放射学杂志, 2012, 21(6): 482-485
作者姓名:李奋强  李立  王文辉  苏东君  常耀文  何学文  郭刚  李明祥  李宝华
作者单位:730000,兰州大学第一医院中西医结合介入医学科
摘    要:目的比较氩氦刀或唑来膦酸单一治疗和联合治疗骨转移癌疼痛的疗效和安全性。方法 84例患者随机分为A组(联合)、B组(氩氦刀)、C组(唑来膦酸)各28例;A组氩氦刀冷冻消融治疗结束后给予唑来膦酸注射液4 mg加入0.9%氯化钠注射液100 ml静脉滴注15 min以上;B组单一使用氩氦刀冷冻消融骨转移癌局部组织;C组给子唑来膦酸注射液4 mg加入0.9%氯化钠注射液100 ml静脉滴注15 min以上。结果①A组止痛总有效率为85.7%,其中显效为35.7%(10/28),有效为50.0%(14/28);B组止痛总有效率为50.0%,其中显效为14.3%(4/28),有效为35.7%(10/28),C组总有效率为67.9%(19/28),其中显效为21.4%(6/28),有效为46.4%(13/28),3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。②平均起效时间:A组为(1.96±2.26)d,B组为(1.43±1.79)d,C组为(11.67±3.14)d,A、B两组与C组之间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。③疗效维持时间:A组为(146.68±1.89)d,B组为(71.60±2.94)d,C组为(112.99±1.37)d,3组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论氩氦刀冷冻消融联合唑来膦酸治疗骨转移癌性疼痛是一种安全、有效的技术。

关 键 词:骨转移癌  氩氦刀  唑来膦酸  疼痛

Separate use or combined use of cryoablation and zoledronic acid for the treatment of pain caused by bone metastases: a comparative study
LI Fen-qiang , LI Li , WANG Wen-hui , SU Dong-jun , CHANG Yao-wen , HE Xue-wen , GUO Gang , LI Ming-xiang , LI Bao-hua. Separate use or combined use of cryoablation and zoledronic acid for the treatment of pain caused by bone metastases: a comparative study[J]. Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2012, 21(6): 482-485
Authors:LI Fen-qiang    LI Li    WANG Wen-hui    SU Dong-jun    CHANG Yao-wen    HE Xue-wen    GUO Gang    LI Ming-xiang    LI Bao-hua
Affiliation:.Department of Interventional Therapy Combining Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine,the First Hospital,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China
Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of separate use or combined use of cryoablation and zoledronic acid in treating the pain caused by bone metastases.Methods A total of 84 patients were randomly and equally divided into three groups with 28 patients in each group.Combination use of cryoablation and zoledronic acid was carried out in patients of group A.The cryoablation catheter ablation was performed first,which was followed by intravenous dripping of zoledronic acid(4mg added in 100 ml normal saline),and the dripping lasted for more than 15 min.For patients in group B,only cryoablation catheter ablation was used for local bone metastases,and only intravenous dripping of zoledronic acid(4mg added in 100 ml normal saline) was given to patients in group C.The clinical results were analyzed and compared among the three groups.Results①For group A,the total anti-pain effect rate was 85.7%, including excellent rate 35.7%(10/28) and effective rate 50.0%(14/28).For group B,the total anti-pain effect rate was 50.0%,including excellent rate 14.3%(4/28) and effective rate 35.7%(10/28).For group C, the total anti-pain effect rate was 67.9%,including excellent rate 21.4%(6/28) and effective rate 46.4% (13/28).The differences among the three groups were statistically significant(P < 0.05).②The mean time to respond in group A,B and C was(1.96±2.26) days,(1.43±1.79) days and(11.67±3.14) days,respectively.The differences between group A and group C as well as between group B and group C were statistically significant(P < 0.05).③The duration of maintaining curative effect in group A,B and C was(146.68±1.89) days,(71.60±2.94) days and(112.99±1.37) days,respectively.The differences among the three groups were statistically significant(P < 0.01).Conclusion Cryoablation ablation combined with intravenous dripping of zoledronic acid is a safe and effective therapy for the treatment of the pain caused by bone metastases.
Keywords:cryoablation  zoledronic acid  bone metastasis  pain
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号