首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

手工法、半自动和全自动凝血仪测定凝血酶原时间的比较
引用本文:林养,吴春芳,林荣华,陈梅. 手工法、半自动和全自动凝血仪测定凝血酶原时间的比较[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2009, 6(13): 1039-1039,1041
作者姓名:林养  吴春芳  林荣华  陈梅
作者单位:广东省湛江市第四人民医院,524008;广东省湛江市第四人民医院,524008;广东省湛江市第四人民医院,524008;广东省湛江市第四人民医院,524008
摘    要:目的研究不同方法测定凝血酶原时间的差别。方法采用手工法、半自动和全自动凝血仪检测相同的血浆标本,以凝固时间(PTT)、实验标本PTT值/健康对照PTT4值(PTR)和国际标准化比值(INR)3项指标进行比较。结果用手工法、半自动和全自动凝血仪PTT值逐步缩短,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01);PTR和INR值用3种方法检测其结果基本一致,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论不同方法检测的PTT值差异有统计学意义,PTR和INR值差异无统计学意义,应当建立自己实验室的参考值,以校准PTT的差异。

关 键 词:凝血酶原时间  方法学  影响因素

Comparison between automatic,semi-automatic analyzer and manual procedure for determination of prothrombin time
LIN Yang,WU Chun-fang,LIN Rong-hua,Chen Mei. Comparison between automatic,semi-automatic analyzer and manual procedure for determination of prothrombin time[J]. Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, 2009, 6(13): 1039-1039,1041
Authors:LIN Yang  WU Chun-fang  LIN Rong-hua  Chen Mei
Affiliation:.( The Fourth Peoples' Hospital of Zhanjiang ,Guangdong 524008, China)
Abstract:Objective To study the difference of prothrombin time determined by automatic,semi-automatic analyzer and manual proce-dure.Methods PTT,PTR,and INR were measured by automatic,semi-automatic analyzer and manual procedure.Results PTT value bacame shorter and shorter in manual way,and the difference is of statistic value.There was no difference in PTR and INR between the three ways.Conclusion There is different impovtance in PTT measurement by automatic,semi-automatic analyzer and manual ways,but no difference...
Keywords:prothombin time  methodology  influent factor  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号