首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种内固定术对髌骨骨折治疗的比较
引用本文:郑泽锋,叶茂,张金金. 两种内固定术对髌骨骨折治疗的比较[J]. 中国现代医生, 2008, 46(19): 59-60
作者姓名:郑泽锋  叶茂  张金金
作者单位:广东省佛山市顺德区龙江镇聚龙医院外科,广东佛山,528319
摘    要:目的比较镍钛记忆合金聚髌器与改良张力带钢丝内固定术治疗髌骨骨折的疗效。方法收集我院住院治疗的77例患者,分为两组分别进行镍钛记忆合金聚髌器(41例)及改良张力带钢丝内固定术(36例)治疗,分析两种方法对髌骨骨折的疗效。结果镍钛记忆合金聚髌器的疗效明显优于改良张力带钢丝内固定术。结论镍钛记忆合金聚髌器内固定术为治疗髌骨骨折的有效方法。

关 键 词:髌骨  骨折  内固定术  治疗

Comparison of Two Internal Fixation Methods in Treating Patella Fractures
ZHENG Zefeng,YF Mao,ZHANG Jinjin. Comparison of Two Internal Fixation Methods in Treating Patella Fractures[J]. , 2008, 46(19): 59-60
Authors:ZHENG Zefeng  YF Mao  ZHANG Jinjin
Affiliation:(Surgical Department,Julong Hospital in Longjiang Town of Shunde District, Foshan 528319)
Abstract:Objective To compare the curative effect between using improved tension band and nickel-titanium memory alloy patellar holder for treating patella fractures. Methods 77 cases were divided into two groups. One group(dlcases) was treated by nickel-titanium memory alloy patellar holder. The other group (36 cases) was treated by modified tension band and steel wire. Results The total rate of curative efficacy was obviously significant in nickel-titanium memory alloy patellar holder group. Conclusion Treatment of nickel-titanium memory alloy patellar holder is worthy of being recommended.
Keywords:Patella  Fracture  Internal fLxation  Treatment
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号