首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2)
Authors:Vincenzo Valentini   Cynthia Aristei   Bengt Glimelius   Bruce D. Minsky   Regina Beets-Tan   Jose M. Borras   Karin Haustermans   Philippe Maingon   Jens Overgaard   Lars Pahlman   Phil Quirke   Hans-Joachim Schmoll   David Sebag-Montefiore   Irving Taylor   Eric Van Cutsem   Cornelius Van de Velde   Numa Cellini   Paolo Latini
Affiliation:Vincenzo Valentini, Cynthia Aristei, Bengt Glimelius, Bruce D. Minsky, Regina Beets-Tan, Jose M. Borras, Karin Haustermans, Philippe Maingon, Jens Overgaard, Lars Pahlman, Phil Quirke, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, David Sebag-Montefiore, Irving Taylor, Eric Van Cutsem, Cornelius Van de Velde, Numa Cellini, Paolo Latini,on behalf of the Scientific Committee
Abstract:

Background and purpose

During the first decade of the 21st century a number of important European randomized studies were published. In order to help shape clinical practice based on best scientific evidence from the literature, the International Conference on ‘Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Treatment: Looking for an European Consensus’ (EURECA-CC2) was organized in Italy under the endorsement of European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), and European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO).

Methods

Consensus was achieved using the Delphi method. The document was available to all Committee members as a web-based document customized for the consensus process. Eight chapters were identified: epidemiology, diagnostics, pathology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment toxicity and quality of life, follow-up, and research questions. Each chapter was subdivided by a topic, and a series of statements were developed. Each member commented and voted, sentence by sentence thrice. Sentences upon which an agreement was not reached after voting round # 2 were openly debated during a Consensus Conference in Perugia (Italy) from 11 December to 13 December 2008. A hand-held televoting system collected the opinions of both the Committee members and the audience after each debate. The Executive Committee scored percentage consensus based on three categories: “large consensus”, “moderate consensus”, and “minimum consensus”.

Results

The total number of the voted sentences was 207. Of the 207, 86% achieved large consensus, 13% achieved moderate consensus, and only 3 (1%) resulted in minimum consensus. No statement was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the members, and the majority was voted on by >85%.

Conclusions

This Consensus Conference represents an expertise opinion process that may help shape future programs, investigational protocols, and guidelines for staging and treatment of rectal cancer throughout Europe.
Keywords:Rectal cancer   Staging   Combined modality treatment   Preoperative radiotherapy   Intraoperative radiotherapy   Surgery   Postoperative radiotherapy   Chemotherapy   Toxicity   Research   Treatment outcome
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号