Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Management: 2nd European Rectal Cancer Consensus Conference (EURECA-CC2) |
| |
Authors: | Vincenzo Valentini Cynthia Aristei Bengt Glimelius Bruce D. Minsky Regina Beets-Tan Jose M. Borras Karin Haustermans Philippe Maingon Jens Overgaard Lars Pahlman Phil Quirke Hans-Joachim Schmoll David Sebag-Montefiore Irving Taylor Eric Van Cutsem Cornelius Van de Velde Numa Cellini Paolo Latini |
| |
Affiliation: | Vincenzo Valentini, Cynthia Aristei, Bengt Glimelius, Bruce D. Minsky, Regina Beets-Tan, Jose M. Borras, Karin Haustermans, Philippe Maingon, Jens Overgaard, Lars Pahlman, Phil Quirke, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, David Sebag-Montefiore, Irving Taylor, Eric Van Cutsem, Cornelius Van de Velde, Numa Cellini, Paolo Latini,on behalf of the Scientific Committee |
| |
Abstract: | Background and purposeDuring the first decade of the 21st century a number of important European randomized studies were published. In order to help shape clinical practice based on best scientific evidence from the literature, the International Conference on ‘Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Treatment: Looking for an European Consensus’ (EURECA-CC2) was organized in Italy under the endorsement of European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), and European Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology (ESTRO).MethodsConsensus was achieved using the Delphi method. The document was available to all Committee members as a web-based document customized for the consensus process. Eight chapters were identified: epidemiology, diagnostics, pathology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, treatment toxicity and quality of life, follow-up, and research questions. Each chapter was subdivided by a topic, and a series of statements were developed. Each member commented and voted, sentence by sentence thrice. Sentences upon which an agreement was not reached after voting round # 2 were openly debated during a Consensus Conference in Perugia (Italy) from 11 December to 13 December 2008. A hand-held televoting system collected the opinions of both the Committee members and the audience after each debate. The Executive Committee scored percentage consensus based on three categories: “large consensus”, “moderate consensus”, and “minimum consensus”.ResultsThe total number of the voted sentences was 207. Of the 207, 86% achieved large consensus, 13% achieved moderate consensus, and only 3 (1%) resulted in minimum consensus. No statement was disagreed by more than 50% of the members. All chapters were voted on by at least 75% of the members, and the majority was voted on by >85%.ConclusionsThis Consensus Conference represents an expertise opinion process that may help shape future programs, investigational protocols, and guidelines for staging and treatment of rectal cancer throughout Europe. |
| |
Keywords: | Rectal cancer Staging Combined modality treatment Preoperative radiotherapy Intraoperative radiotherapy Surgery Postoperative radiotherapy Chemotherapy Toxicity Research Treatment outcome |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|