A clinical comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilar G-CSF and originator G-CSF in haematopoietic stem cell mobilization

BackgroundRecombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is widely used to mobilize haematopoietic stem cells. We compared the efficacy and safety of a biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio^®, Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals) with the originator G-CSF (Neupogen^®, Amgen) in patients with haematological malignancies.MethodsA total of 108 patients were included in this study, 59 of whom were female (49 male), with an overall median age of 51 years (range 19–69). Patients had multiple myeloma (n = 46), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 28), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 26), or other diagnosis (n = 8). After administration of mobilizing regimens (primarily high-dose etoposide, high-dose cyclophosphamide, intermediate-dose Ara-C or ESHAP), patients were randomized to a standard daily 10 μg/kg dose of biosimilar G-CSF (n = 54) or originator G-CSF (n = 54).ResultsMedian duration of G-CSF administration was 8 days with both biosimilar G-CSF (range 4–17) and originator G-CSF (range 4–14). Both groups had a median of one apheresis with a median time until first apheresis of 11 days. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the mean ± SD number of mobilized CD34+ cells/μL in peripheral blood or the number of CD34+ cells/kg body weight. Five patients (9%) in the originator G-CSF group and six patients in the biosimilar G-CSF group (11%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells. The adverse event profile was similar between groups.ConclusionsA biosimilar G-CSF (Zarzio^®) demonstrated similar efficacy and safety as the reference originator G-CSF (Neupogen^®) in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with haematological malignancies.