首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease
Affiliation:1. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris- Hôpital de Bicêtre, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France;2. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Clinique mutualiste La Sagesse, Rennes, France;3. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris- maternité Port Royal, Hôpital Cochin, France;4. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris- Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France;5. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, CHU d’Estaing, Clermont-Ferrand, France;6. Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Hôpital privé Natecia, Lyon, France;7. Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre hospitalier des quatre villes, Sèvres, France;8. Service de Gynécologie Obstétrique, Centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
Abstract:Despite the advent of newer, and in some instances less invasive, interventions for the management of abnormal uterine bleeding, hysterectomy remains the most commonly performed major gynaecological operation. It continues to score highest in satisfaction rates. It is therefore imperative that all aspects of this operation are reviewed on a regular basis. For example, all evidence suggests that the vaginal route is the safest, most cost-effective approach affording rapid recovery, yet the majority of hysterectomies are still performed by the abdominal route. Newer approaches such as robotic surgery have captured the imagination of the enthusiasts, yet this approach is hugely expensive, and there are no data justifying its use over the laparoscopic or indeed the conventional approach. Quality of life should remain the principal outcome measure for hysterectomy for benign disease, and therefore the impact of the various approaches to hysterectomy should address this outcome. Complications of any new approach should be addressed, and the question that continues to elude an answer, namely why there are such widely and wildly varying rates of hysterectomy between surgeons in one hospital, between hospitals in one region, between the regions and between countries, should continue to be addressed, and perhaps one day the definitive study that will answer the question will be undertaken.
Keywords:abdominal hysterectomy  alternatives to hysterectomy  laparoscopic hysterectomy  myomectomy  ovarian conservation  pelvic organ function complications of hysterectomy  psychological sequelae of hysterectomy  quality of life  robotically assisted hysterectomy  vaginal hysterectomy
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号