首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

经皮髓核成形术与椎间盘切除术治疗退变性颈椎间盘突出症
引用本文:Li J,Yan DL,Gao LB,Tan PX,Zhang ZH,Zhang Z. 经皮髓核成形术与椎间盘切除术治疗退变性颈椎间盘突出症[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2006, 44(12): 822-825
作者姓名:Li J  Yan DL  Gao LB  Tan PX  Zhang ZH  Zhang Z
作者单位:510150,广州医学院附属广州市第二人民医院骨科
基金项目:广东省医学科研基金(A2005563)
摘    要:目的比较经皮髓核成形术与经皮椎间盘切除术治疗退变性颈椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及对颈椎稳定性的影响。方法2002年7月至2004年12月共收治退变性颈椎间盘突出症患者80例,行经皮髓核成形术42例(PCN组),经皮椎间盘切除术38例(PCD组)。回顾性分析两组的临床资料,比较两组在手术时间、临床效果及颈椎稳定性等的差异。结果所有病例随访6~26个月,PCN组平均(12±5)个月;PCD组平均(12±4)个月。两组手术均获成功。两组手术时间有显著差异(t=-21·70,P=0·000);两组手术临床效果(JOA评分)经自身配对t检验显示均有显著性差异(PCN:t=14·05,P=0·000;PCD:t=-14·79,P=0·000),即两组均有效;两组手术临床效果(Williams评分)经Kruskal-Wallis检验无显著差异(z=-0·377,P=0·706,>0·05),即两组临床效果相似。两组手术后均无颈椎不稳病例发生,颈椎稳定性手术前后均无显著差异(P>0·05)。结论经皮髓核成形术与经皮椎间盘切除术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的临床疗效优良,对颈椎稳定性影响小,不会造成颈椎失稳的发生。

关 键 词:椎间盘移位 颈椎 椎间盘切除 经皮 髓核成形
收稿时间:2005-07-25
修稿时间:2005-07-25

Comparison percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty and cervical discectomy for the treatment of cervical disc herniation
Li Jian,Yan Deng-lu,Gao Liang-bin,Tan Ping-xian,Zhang Zai-heng,Zhang Zhi. Comparison percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty and cervical discectomy for the treatment of cervical disc herniation[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2006, 44(12): 822-825
Authors:Li Jian  Yan Deng-lu  Gao Liang-bin  Tan Ping-xian  Zhang Zai-heng  Zhang Zhi
Affiliation:Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Municipal People's Hospital, Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510150, China.
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To compare the therapeutic effect of percutaneous cervical disc nucleoplasty (PCN group) and percutaneous cervical discectomy (PCD group) for the treatment of cervical disc herniation. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out from July of 2002 to December of 2004, and there were 80 cervical disc herniation cases who were operated by PCN (42 cases) or PCD (38 cases). The time of operation, clinical result and the stability of cervical spine after operation were evaluated and compared between 2 groups. RESULTS: All cases had been followed up from 6 months to 26 months, average (12 +/- 5) months on the PCN group and (12 +/- 4) months on the PCD group, and there was no significant difference on 2 groups (t = -0.06, P = 0.953). All cases had been successfully operated. There was significant difference in the operation time between 2 groups (t = -21.70, P = 0.000). There was significant difference in the pre- and post-operation scores of each group (PCN group: t = 14.05, P = 0.000; PCD group: t = -14.79, P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in 2 groups of the clinical outcomes (z = -0.377, P = 0.706, > 0.05). There was no instability of cervical spine cases in 2 groups after operation (P > 0.05), and the cervical spine stability was no significant difference in pre- and-operation in each group. CONCLUSIONS: PCN and PCD for the treatment of cervical disc herniation achieves good outcomes and no difference on the stability of cervical spine. PCN and PCD is a safe, minimally invasive, short time of operation, less traumatic operation and excellent clinical outcome.
Keywords:Intervertebral disc-displacement   Cervical vertebrae   Discectomy,percutaneous   Nucleoplasty
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号